 Transubstantiation (or the change of the substance of Bread and Wine) in the Supper of the Lord cannot be proved by Holy Writ ; but is repugnant to the plain words of Scripture, overthroweth the nature of a Sacrament, and hath given occasion to many superstitions.  The Eclectic review. vol. 1-New [8th] - Page 5251845Full view - About this book
 | Jeremy Morris, Nicholas Sagovsky - Religion - 2003 - 244 pages
...warranty of Scripture, but rather repugnant to the Word of God' (XXII). Similarly, they affirm that 'Transubstantiation (or the change of the substance of Bread and Wine) in the Supper of the Lord, cannot be proved by Holy Writ; but is repugnant to the plain words of Scripture, overthroweth... | |
 | Literature - 2003
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | Reference - 2003 - 664 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | Gerald Lewis Bray - History - 2004 - 675 pages
...the substance of bread and wine into the substance of Christ's body and blood (in the supper of the Lord), cannot be proved by Holy Writ, but is repugnant to the plain words of Scripture, (overthroweth 302 Quum naturae humanae veritas require!, ut unius eiusdemque homints corpus in multis locis simul... | |
 | Zondervan, - Religion - 2010 - 272 pages
...Communion as commands given by Jesus. Thus the Church of England's Article of Religion XXVIII (1563): "Transubstantiation (or the change of the substance of Bread and Wine) in the Supper of the Lord, cannot be proved by Holy Writ; but is repugnant to the plain words of Scripture, overthroweth... | |
| |
