CONTENTS. AN ATTEMPT TO RESTORE THE ORIGINAL HEBREW TEXT OF BALAAM'S PROPHECY CONCERNING THE Originally suggested by the London Curate's doubt of the tion, “Behold the Man!” to Balaam's prophecy, Num. xxiv. 7.-Corruption of the present Hebrew text and authenticity of the Septuagint version of the prophecy, proved from the Chaldee paraphrast, Philo and Jo- sephus ;—prevalence of the prophecy, from Suetonius– -gradual corruption of the present Hebrew text, shewn from the Syriac, Arabic and Samaritan versions;→→ probable time of its adulteration, and by whom ;— Present and Reformed Text compared together; →→→ the grounds of the Reformation shewn;-from the Targum of Jonathan Ben Uzziel, of Jerusalem, from Cyprian, from the Samaritan text;-from supposed parallel passages;-from the context; especially from David, not the speaker in this Psalm, as mistakingly sup- 66 St. Paul the author of the Epistle;-Why he did not profess himself the author;-New translation of the Introduction;-Remarks ;-GOD, the original author of all Revelation, proved from Holy Writ, and from Jewish philosophy ;-the phrase " in the prophets," ex- plained; the peculiar Sonship of CHRIST;" the "worlds," the visible creation; not "the ages" or dispensations of the Socinians;Лoyos, aпаvɣaσμa, and xapanτng, explained from the Wisdom of Solomon, and Philo;-Superiority of CHRIST above Moses ;— above the angels ;-Oration of Aristides, in praise of Scripture; eos, not the nominative, but the voca- ON THE ORIGINAL PROPHECY OF CHRIST THE SON Importance of this prophecy;-A double sense of it un- happily maintained by the generality of Christian di- vines and expositors;-grounds of this opinion;-New Translation of the parallel prophecies, 2 Sam. vii. 1-15; and 1 Chron. xvii. 1-14;—and of the second parallel prophecies, 1 Chron. xxii. 7-8; and 1 Chron. xxviii. 2-9 ;-Remarks ;-Difference of the two prophecies; -in the times, circumstances, and persons ;-mistrans- This Psalm a commentary on Nathan's prophecy; DISSERTATION VI. p. 111. ON THE PRIMITIVE NAMES OF THE DEITY. PART I, The great importance and necessity of this disquisition; -insufficiency of the Disquisition thereon, in the British Critic ;-The grand cause of etymological error in this abstruse subject;-This hypothesis examined ;The two simplest and most ancient of the divine names, 38, ÆL, and 7', IAH;—Supposed derivations of 58, EL, and R, ELOH;-Strange mistake of Parkhurst; -Supposed derivations of IAI, and AнOH; -the leading ideas or significations of these primitive names. PART II. p. 145. р Objection drawn from the great abstruseness of the subject removed;-Power, the leading attribute of the DEITY among all nations ;-Mistake of Parkhurst ;→→→→ The Latin Dis or Pluto, whence derived,―further mistake of Parkhurst ;-mistake of the British Critic, respecting the application of ELOHIM to CHRIST, Ps. xlv. 6; Judg. xiii. 22;—Apparent solecism in the very beginning of Genesis rectified;-Phila's fine description of THE ORACLE OF GOD. PART III. p. 179. Greater difficulty of this part of the disquisition;-True meaning of 1AH, intimating" sameness;"the mystical IACCHUS of the Greeks ;—Its distinction from IAHOH; -Clarian Oracle respecting IAN;-Whence the polytheism of the philosophizing Pagans ; — degenerated anto Atheism;-Remarkable testimony of the Pythian Oracle to the wisdom of the Chaldeans and Hebrews; --true meaning of IAHOH, signifying " one;"--communicated to CHRIST also ;-mistakes of Lindsey, Dodson, and Blaney ;-—meanings of Adon, or Adoni;—explanation of Ps. cx. 1, and correction of the Septuagint; -true derivation of Adon;-intimate connexion between the Old and New Testament ;-meaning of the mysterious title, EHIEH ASHER EHIEH, I AM WHO AM;"—enlarged in the Apocalypse;-fragments of the Orphic Hymns, and Sibylline Oracles;-Remarkable inscription on the temple of NEITH in Egypt ;meaning of AON or ON;-Indian Theology. Mischievous double sense of this Psalm, invented by the later Jewish Rabbins ;-proved by their own confessions;-Solomon Jarchi's remarkable acknowledgment; New Translation of the Psalm ;-Remarks ;-Commentary of the Apostles thereon;- Miracle of the tribute money found in the fish's mouth, explained, and Gilpin corrected;-correction of the Masoretic punctuation of Nasachti;-Note on the present state of Sion and Calvary; the peculiar Sonship of CHRIST-the resurrection, the day of his new birth; -Voltaire's Antichristian conspiracy;-THE SON to be honoured as THE FATHER;-Conclusion of the Psalm, inapplicable to David as its object. |