Such, many years paffed, was the character given of Isaiah in one of the most confummate works of criticism: an important work indeed, whether we confider its fubferviency to religion, the fupremeft object of human concern, or its reference to poetry, that highest energy of human intellect, that noblest and loveliest expreffion of human fentiment and paffion, that laft perfection of human language, that fureft embalmer of wifdom for all ages, that art for ever dignified by the practice of the holy prophets, and by the folemn fanction of the divine fpirit itself; in a few words, that art which can (if any can) alone give us the most perfect and attractive image of virtue, and with a fort of God-like faculty spread before us a fairer order of things, and create (as it were) a new heaven and a new earth to raise our drooping fpirits.' We believe the author would find fome difficulty in proving that the prophets always expreffed themfelves poetically, and in explaining to our fatisfaction how the art itself has obtained the fanction of the divine Spirit. The latter affertion is an abfurdity: the former, if we understand him right, a mistake. If he means, that because the prophets ufed in general a poetic ftyle, that therefore fomething facred is annexed to the nature of poetry, the idea is puerile. It might be proved that there is fomething noble and divine in profe, and equally fubfervient to religion, by the fame argument; for Chrift fpoke, and his apoftles wrote, without any artificial arrangement of words, or modulation of numbers. In regard to what follows, in the Preface, we heartily concur with the author in the praifes bestowed on Dr. Lowth, but do not equally agree with him in other matters; not fo much that we controvert his pofitions, as that we really do not comprehend them. What connection, for infance, can we find, or what meaning collect, from the following ill forted fentences? The whole chain of argumentation, if we may call it fo, feems compofed of broken links of heterogeneous materials. The literary taste of a people must in part be imputed to literary principles, and in this refpect we are right or wrong not only from what we commonly do, but from what we commonly read, from the habit of our fpeculations as well as actions. To be prejudiced, is a difpofition to which one is fubject more than is ufually fufpected, and therefore we too much admire as well as defpife the works of antiquity, overlooking the gains as well as loffes of time.It is God-like in many in ftances to be pleafed with variety, for variety characterifes the works as well as word of God. We too often condemn as wrong what we fhould rather fay we dislike, and we thence form theories to justify prejudice, and to rivet infirmity on the mind, instead of fuch as would increase its ftrength, enlarge its fympathy with whatever excellency, and difpofe it to en courage the advancement of laudable things. The works of men, that are now no more, and which are come down to us 5 precious precious from the fiery fearching of many ages, affuredly demand the stamp of praise from the prefent times.' We are forry to obferve that, in too many other places where the author aims at being argumentative, he becomes abstruse ; and where he attempts an elevation of ftyle, he degenerates into bombait. As a fpecimen of his poetical abilities we shall give his version of the feven firft verfes of the fifty-third chapter, which contains the remarkable prediction of our Saviour's humble appearance on earth, and is probably as interesting and pathetic a paffage as any in the prophecies of Ifaiah. Who (fhall he fay) hath our report receiv'd? Yea of a mean prefentment from his birth. Yet not for his offences but our own f.. tome fome places Mr. Butt has wrote in a more fpirited manner, and confequently fucceeded better; and we would recommend to him in any future compofition, not to be fo poetical in his profe, and to be less profaic in his verfe. Abelard to Eloifa: an Epißle. With a new Account of their Lives, and References to their Original Correfpondence. Small 8vo. 6d. Dilly. HIS Epiftle, or rather the sketch of it, appeared in a small poetical collection, of which we gave fome account, vol. lvii. p. 5. It is now altered and confiderably enlarged. We then took notice that the author, confidered as an imitator, not a rival, of Pope, appeared in a refpe&table light ;' and we obferve, with pleasure, that the prefent poem approaches ftill nearer to that author's in grace and harmony. As our first opimon was given without any quotation to eftablish its juftice, we fhall fubmit the following in vindication of our fentiments. The first lines allude to the abbey of St. Gildas, in Britanny, from whence Abelard's epiftles are faid to be written. The concluding ones, which defcribe his former affection as rekindled at the name of Eloifa, mixed with the enthufiaftic fentiments his fituation would moft naturally be fuppofed to pro duce, are truly beautiful. Miftaking man who thinks in fhades to find From common woes that all his race endure.. Ye naked hills, unblefs'd by nature's care! Will oft on fancy'd thrones and fceptres dwell; In vain remonftrance lends her feeble aid, Or Or banish'd hence to Paraclete remove, "Wild at the found to folitude 1 fly, To foothe, with pious hopes the finner's breast, From fcenes like thofe when Eloifa's foul Afpires in holy trance beyond the pole, When every mortal care is lull'd to rest, 'And fure when hope with infant hold prepar'd F Severer 1 Severer fcience join'd the blooming train, "O treacherous moment, fhort, and infecure! Thofe auburn ringlets taught by love to flow, Those flattering fcenes that hope fhall gild no more." MONTHLY CATALOGUE. THE POETR An Invocation to Melancholy. Y. A Fragment. 4to. HE fubject of this performance is capable of high poetical imbellishments, and the author has fometimes fucceeded in their delineation. Like Hotfpur, he apprehends a world of figures,' but they are not in general properly methodised, nor ac |