For spurning grov'ling cares control, Will spring with more than mortal pow'r. Their fountain swells too high- 'Oh 'tis an hour when weeping love The Heav'ns are all in peace above,` "Return, belov'd," the warrior said, Nor let me think thy heart dismay'd For sure, this mild and beauteous night, While o'er the hills I speed my flight, To meet my gallant train." "Nay, why this haste? Indeed 'tis soon," The weeper murmur'd still, "Oh rest, but till the waning moon Looks o'er the eastern hill: For fearful now is hill and glen, So desolate and drear; But sweet will be the moonlight then, "Dear Edith, 'tis our hour to part," The warrior mildly said, &c. The 'Battle of Niagara' was before the public in its first edition with every possible disadvantage which its worst enemies, or the enemies of its author, if he have any, could have devised. It was worse than anonymous, for a ridiculous name was attached to it, together with a ridiculous motto-as if on purpose to deter every one from reading the poem. It was, however, evident to all that had, notwithstanding, curiosity to look into the work, that it was the production of a mind gifted with a considerable share of poetic talent. And it indicated such ease in versifying, or rather such an unwillingness to refrain from versifying, even at the expense of frequent repetition of the same idea, that we did not doubt the writer would soon appear again, and probably to more advantage as his first essay was rather a proof of the possession of powers than of their exertion. en Accordingly, we have now before us the second edition larged and otherwise much improved, with the poet's real name annexed-the motto changed-and a preface, in which he, with great good humour, acquaints us with part of his own history, and the history of this poem. His palinode is very candid. The first edition, he says, 'was crowded and disfigured with innumerable errors-chiefly typographical, however; though in some cases, whole lines were left out, by myself, I dare say, in copying my manuscript for the press; and, from a long process of continual interpolation and refinement, whenever the whim seized me, the repetitions and extravagancies were about as numerous, as all the rest of the blunders together.' The title page too he acknowledges has been universally, indignantly, and I must say, justly censured. The plain truth of the matter is this. I am ashamed of it: I was ashamed of it, from the first moment it was written; but having been much excited, where I had no business to be, under circumstances, which cannot be explained in this place,-I abandoned my first purpose, which was to print it with a modest title, under a fictitious name; and adopted the rascally burlesque, which now disgraces the volume. It was severely censured when I began to blush for it; but then I had too much obstinacy to acknowledge my folly, or to atone for it.' 'I have been baited too, for disingenuousness, as others have chosen to call it but, as it really is, for falsehood-lying-in the preface. I deserved it. I did wrong. Yet, as it was anonymous, mostly true, and, as I then thought, though I now think differently, innocent, because not malicious, my conscience did not reproach me-or I would have burnt the book, and the hand that wrote it too, before I would have been guilty of such a thing. To show the sincerity of my compunction, with the hope that the former preface will be forgotten, I shall put my real name in black and white, at the bottom of this, and thereby, hold myself responsible for its truth.' He is very much displeased with the Port Folio and the Analectic Magazine for not having reviewed his poem, and with the inhabitants of Philadelphia, because they would not come to the Washington Hall to hear him recite it-but if his strictures were at all likely to excite the smallest disposition to speak of him less favourably, another part of his preface would more than counterbalance the effect, and incline us to treat him with the utmost respect and good will. We mean the disclosure that he is a particular and intimate friend of the Rev. Mr. Pierpoint, author of the 'Airs of Palestine'-and that he was instigated by that gentleman to undertake the Battle of Niagara.' · Of Mr. Pierpoint, and any one whom he distinguishes by his friendship and approbation, we shall always have great pleasure in speaking in terms of unqualified respect. His Airs of Palestine' have not received even justice at the hands of his countryWe say it the more freely, because this Journal, under other auspices, was accessary in exciting an unreasonable prejudice against that work, which contains as much good poetry, to say the men. least, as is to be found in the productions of any living American poet. We trust he will accept our amende, which is perfectly disinterested and sincere. The Battle of Niagara' is entirely without plot;-as far as we can understand it (for it is exceedingly mysterious, and all that') —indeed the author scorns plots, and thinks them as ill placed in descriptive poems as in a song. We may therefore seek any where for a specimen-the following is among the best parts:'Hark! that sweet song!-how full of tenderness! O, who would breathe in this voluptuous press With form-all joy and dance-as bright and free A blooming infant to her heart is prest; A single bound!-our chief is standing by, A choking transport drowns his manly tone; He sees the closing of a mild, blue eye, His bosom echoes to a faint low cry; His glorious boy springs freshly from its sleep; Her colour comes and goes, like that faint ray, "Come, Glory, come! Let's chant the soldier's dirge; In sacrifice for thee?-when blade met blade; That bleeds and battles 'till his breath has ceased; Toiled dark upon the mount to spread the vulture's feast.' A shorter poem entitled 'Goldau, or the Maniac Harper,' comprised in the same volume, although the author deems so slightly of it as to place it undistinguished among the other pɔems,' is, we think, a very superior production to the preceding one. The village of Goldau in Switzerland, was destroyed by the sudden fall of part of mount Rosburg, in 1806. This incident Mr. Neal has made the ground work of his poem-and his 'Maniac Harper' is a youth whom he supposes to have lost all the objects of his affections in that calamity. The idea is a good one, and is very well managed-it only needs the exercise of that last and hardest art, the art to blot' to render it a very beautiful poem. The opening is thus: 'Upon a tranquil-glorious night, When all the western heaven was bright; Somewhat, that told where fire had been; For yet, a sorrowing beam was there; 'And this would be while yet the fire And taught to peasant hearts the feeling And that his sad, appealing air— And never but in warriors seen! 'But those who knew him, knew full well Upon his heart, and froze the source, The heart-drops of our youthful years; Mildews the blossom in its blow; And breathes o'er Fancy's budding wreath A cloud that tells of coming night, The sunset was his favourite hour; As if its last, and loveliest ray Would win his very soul away; And there were those, who, when he stood, Sublime in airy solitude, Upon his mountain's topmost height, With arms outstretch'd, to meet the light |