Page images
PDF
EPUB

REVIEWS AND CRITICISM.

tronage, bluster, or noise; and so counted his income by pence instead of pounds.

SPIRITUAL PRIDE.

SPIRITUAL pride often has a modest face and demure look. He says he likes to be unknown, yet publishes all his little doings, and makes the religious world ring with his fame. In almost every religious magazine and newspaper you see his name. Popularity out of his own pale he affects to despise; but within his own he appears to live upon its very breath. He is a staunch advocate of liberty of conscience, but does not understand how any can differ from him. Christians may read their bible, but his interpretation must be received. He knows nothing, and yet he knows everything. He is full of verbal humility; but impatient of contradiction, and savage under the influence of reproof. Now he blows hot, and anon he blows cold; now he bleats like a lamb, anon he roars like a lion; now he is so strong that he appears to triumph over all the ordinary feelings of humanity; anon he is led captive by a little fulsome praise. Who can understand Spiritual Pride? Its sophistries are infinite; its disguises, of every colour, shape, and form; its cruelty, insatiable; its false

45

[blocks in formation]

Do you think they are the best servants who are all for what they can get from an earthly prince, or those who study most what service they can do for him?

Are they not the best servants the Prince of Life has, who study how they can best serve and minister to him? When asking the Lord for more grace, the thought sometimes has rushed into my mind-"What do you want an increase of grace for?" Is it for the purpose of laying it up, or laying it out, that thereby the Giver may be glorified? "Occupy till I come."

"With even mind thy course of duty run;
God nothing does, or suffers to be done,
But thou wouldst do thyself, if thou couldst see
The end of all events as well as he."

Reviews and Criticism.

The faith of Rahab Defended. By Mr. JAMES WELLS. London: G. J. Stevenson. IN our January number we entered at some length into the controversy growing out of the sermon of which the present is a lame defence. We sustained against Mr. Wells the charges which his best friends have made :-that it was excessively vulgar, justified lying, made God accessary to crime, and was the essence of Jesuitism.

We now propose to consider a few additional points.

Irony. "I now come to Rahab," says Mr. Wells, and I hold that Rahab uttered these words in what I call irony." First, he tells us they were "good lies," then they are metamorphosed into "lawful evasions,' and now, with the magician's wand, they are juggled into irony. "Irony," Mr. Wells tells us (quoting Walker), "is a mode of speech wherein the meaning is contrary to the words." Very good. The Hon. H. Home Kames says, under " Figures of Speech," ," "Irony turns things into ridicule

[ocr errors]

in a peculiar manner. It consists in laughing at a man under disguise of appearing to praise or speak well of him." (Vol. i. p. 294,5.) If we were to say, "of course Mr. Wells is a sound theologian; no man disputes his orthodoxy, &c.,' all our readers would know that we were using the figure of speech called irony. If they, not knowing that it was a figure of speech, received it literally, it would be to them a falsehood; and if we thought we could cheat the devil by cloaking our crime with the name irony, we should be guilty of falsehood also. With what gusto Mr. Wells seems to enjoy Rahab's lies. Listen to the following profane and blasphemous passage, as he represents the spies asking, "Will the Holy Spirit of God inspire her with those evasions that shall save our lives?

She has done them; she has deluded them: a woman is just the one for it. See the fools, how they are running, going off in pursuit! depend upon it Rahab had a good hearty laugh at the last." (p. 398).

46

REVIEWS AND CRITICISM.

Can there be any thing more horrid than this in the whole compass of the English, or any other language. In the infidel literature of France or England, can anything more atrocious be found? Is Mr. Wells really sane? Or are we discussing the ebulitions of a disordered mind? If so, we deplore his condition, and pity him; but supposing him sane, we carnestly bescech him to look the horrid monster of his own creation in the face. Good lies, lawful evasions, delusions, the Holy Ghost inspiring those lies, jubilant joy at their success, and to crown all a roar of laughter at those fools she has deluded by the Holy Ghost! And "this is the best part of her conduct"!!! Does Mr. Wells need to be told that figures of speech were never made to facilitate lying? Suppose a missionary were to tell a heathen that "God is a rock," in such a manner as to convince the poor fellow that God was made of granite, or limestone, and then indulged in a hearty laugh at "the fool," would any one attempt to justify him by the miserable subterfuge that it was only a figure of speech,-a metaphor. In that bold irony of Elijah to the prophets of Baal, the very force and point of it is in the fact that they knew he was speaking ironically. "And it came to pass at noon that Elijah mocked them and said, cry aloud, for he is a God; either he is talking, or he is pursuing, or he is in a journey, or peradventure he sleepeth, and must be awaked. (1 Kings xviii. 27.) Had he stated this in such a manner as to make them believe that such infirmities were the suitable attributes of God, it would have been deception and lying, of which the prophet could not be guilty; but as fine and keen irony it poured contempt and ridicule upon their vain and delusive worship.

66

But where is the proof that Rahab spoke ironically? If she did, will it make matters any better? Did she not in plain words deceive the messengers? and is not deception lying? If not, a servant need have no qualm of conscience in denying her master or mistress. There's a rat-tat at the door. "Is your master at home, Mary?" 'No, sir; he went out about an hour ago, and won't be home till late." "Say that Mr. So-and-so called." The door closes. Mary has a good hearty laugh, and exclaims in an under-tone, "Did not I deceive him nicely? master will be pleased." But, BUT, can conscience say, that was right? Yes; Mr. Wells says those lies are only irony, and a good cause sanctifies them; and the Bible says servants must please and obey

their masters. No doubt Mr. Wells will use to this what he calls the "old woman's" exclamation, and say "how awful!" True; but it is only the carrying into practice of his own doctrine. But Mr. W. will exclaim, "the cases are dissimilar: Rahab was inspired." Indeed! who told him so? where is his proof? We never heard of her inspiration at all; but to be inspired to tell lies requires a great amount of proof before it can be received by any well-balanced mind. This is the most miserable petitio principii or begging the question we ever met with.

Borrowing of the Egyptians. Mr. Wells attempts to defend the doctrine of the suspension of the moral law by the case of the Israelites borrowing of the Egyptians. "Now," says Mr. Wells, "I am going to show that the usual law of honesty was on that occasion suspended." IS THAT TRUE? We emphatically deny it. What is the meaning of the word Shaal, in our translation rendered borrow? Parkhurst gives its primary meaning, to ask, to interrogate; secondly, to ask, demand, require; and only its fifth meaning, to ask as a loan, to borrow. Ray gives its primary meaning,

66

66

asked, required, demanded." Mr. W. says, Learned men have tried to make the Hehrew word translated borrow say something else, but they can't do it.” (p. 395.) * In Gen. xxiv. 47, and many other passages it could not be rendered borrow. Take Mr. W's. translation, "And I borrowed her, and said whose daughter art thou Could anything make greater nonsense? Again, in Deut. x. 12, And now, Israel, what doth the Lord thy God (Shaal) require of thee, but to fear the Lord thy God, &c." How could require be rendered borrow? Just try it with borrow: "What doth the Lord thy God borrow of thee, but to fear the Lord thy God, &c." We could give a number of other quotations to shew the various meanings of the Hebrew Shaal, but forbear. The whole of the sermon is full of the most shallow criticism, and loaded with the most dangerous error and. God-dishonouring assertions. Of sound argument there is scarcely a particle, the ad captandum vulgus to satiety, and fulminations enough to satisfy the admirers of Pope Hildebrand.

*The fact is, however, on the contrary, just this: the word is translated "borrow" in only three other passages, while it is rendered "demand" or "require" in TEN. Ainsworth translates it in this place 66 ASK,' " and in the LXX. the word is AITEO, to ask, request, require, beg.

MONTHLY RECORD OF PASSING EVENTS.

Devout and Explanatory Reflections on Important Portions of God's Word; or, a Short Sermon, and a Short Song for every day in the year, &c. By GEORGE WYARD. London: Briscoe, Banner-street. FULL of sweet and precious reflections and expositions of the Divine Word, well adapted for family, as well as private reading. This is the third vol. We trust the fourth will not be long ere it appear. The present reviewer has not seen the former parts; but there is no just reason to doubt their excellence if we may judge by the volume now before us, which has our thorough and hearty commendation.

Our Associations: their Advantages, and
Capabilities. By JAMES MURSELL, of
Kettering. London: Elliot Stock.

OUR Associations might do a vast amount
of good, if thoroughly united on sound and
just principles. We know several Associa-
tions having in them a few strict commu-
nion churches, which, notwithstanding
that fact, publish large placards, inviting
christians of all denominations to the Lord's
Supper. The Open Communion HIGH MASS.
With such management we believe many
of these Associations neutralize with one
hand the good they do with the other.

47

Brother Mursell writes well, and his remarks are worthy of the solemn consideration of our ministers and churches.

Baptist Tract Society's Hand-bills, Nos.
69 to 71. Londor: Elliot Stock.
THESE are from C. II. Spurgeon's "Tracts
of Testimony," and a true and trite testi-
mony they bear. In No. 71 occurs the
following paragraph:-"Our Pædobaptist
friends ask us Baptists why we do not
sprinkle infants; we reply, it is not in the
Book. They ask us why we do not admit
any to the church who are unbaptised.
We reply, It is not in the Book; and what-
ever is not in the Book is all moonshine."
Very good Mr. Spurgeon-but why not
ask another question,--" Why not admit
any to the communion of the Lord's Sup-
per (a church ordinance) unbaptised ?".
The answer would certainly be the same.

Take care whom you Marry. By T. W.
MEDHURST, Glasgow. London: Baptist
Tract Society.

AN important theme, well handled, and
deserving of far more attention than it
generally receives.

Monthly Record of Passing Events.

A CHECK TO RITUALISM.-The Bishop of London intends to introduce a Bill into Parliament providing for certain alterations in the ritual, if not in the liturgy of the Prayer-book, which are evidently intended as a check to the rampant innovations of the Puseyites. Already a deputation has been appointed on behalf of the parties aimed at, to withstand the proposed change, which they propose doing by presenting a memorial on the subject direct to the Archbishop of Canterbury, in the following terms:-"We the undersigned clergy or laycommunicants in the church of England, respectfully object to any alteration in the book of Common Prayers, respecting 'the ornaments of the church and the ministers thereof,' and the mode and manner of performing divine service according to the use of the church of England.

SCIENCE ON SUNDAY EVENINGS.-An attempt is now being made under the aus

pices of some of the most eminent literary
and scientific men in the country, to secu-
larize the Lord's day, and to set aside the
generally recognized connection between
that day and the claims of revelation.
On six successive sabbath evenings, com-
mencing on January 7th, six talented sci-
entific lecturers (including such men as
Professor Huxley and Professor Carpenter)
have engaged to deliver lectures on various
branches of natural science, such as Ge-
ology, etc., in St. Martin's Hall, London,
accompanied with "sacred music."
is tempted to ask, why sacred music? why
not secular music, to accompany secular
lectures? Among those who are put forth
as connected with this movement, are Mr.
Charles Dickens, Mr. Layard, Mr. J. S.
Mill and, we are sorry to say, Professor
Owen also! We regard it as one of the most
advanced stages in the progress of the op-
ponents of Evangelical truth, towards

One

48

MONTHLY RECORD OF PASSING EVENTS.

setting up the idol of science in the place of revelation, which the present age has yet seen. At the first lecture, the place of meeting, St. Martin's Hall, was crammed. The lecturer was Professor Huxley, whose "discourse" was virtually a deification of natural knowledge at the expense of revelation. The lecturer studiously refrained from any recognition of Divine power or Divine providence; God was, as it were, bowed out of his universe, and human intellect enthroned in his place. The second lecture was by Sir J. Browning, upon the progress of Pagan nations in religious knowledge apart from christianity.

of

THE "INDEPENDENT BAPTISTS Jamaica form distinct communities from the regular Baptist churches founded by the labours of the Baptist missionaries of this country, and have scarcely anything in common with them except the practice of immersion. Mr. T. Hands, Baptist minister of Luton, Beds., who resided in Jamaica many years, states that they are communities of native negroes, tainted with many wild and violent ideas, and that it was amongst these Baptists that the negro outbreak at Morant Bay took place, no native member of any regular Baptist church being in any way implicated therein. Respecting Mr. Gordon, Mr. Hands says that he knew him personally as an educated gentleman, a man of property, and a consistent, God-fearing man, foremost in works of christian usefulness amongst the negro population, deeply concerned for their welfare, but utterly incapable of urging them to any acts of violence or bloodshed.

BISHOP COLENSO has at length got back to his Cathedral at Natal, though not without a "scene." He had to apply to the Chief Justice for an interdict to prevent the churchwardens closing the doors against him. The Dean publicly adjured him to depart from the building in the name of the Lord, and yet stayed to hear him preach. Obviously the best plan would have been to let the heretical Bishop officiate to empty benches. Natal will doubtless be kept lively by the contest between the rival dignitaries, for some time

to come

MEDIEVAL SYMBOLISM.-The churches devoted to the Tractarian party have formed, during the recent Christmas season, the scene of such a display of Romish trumpery as has never before been witness

ed. The very names of the dresses worn by these priestly votaries of Rome are clearly marks of an apostate church: Chasuble, dalmatic, tunicle, cotta and cassock. What are they but relics of a dark age brought forward to the nineteenth century? The system suits well for impressible young ladies wanting religious excitement, but is alien to all true protestant feeling. Dr. Miller, Mr. Goodhart, Mr. D. Wilson, and other Evangelicals have formed themselves into an association to oppose these innovations, but they will never succeed except by such means as they shrink from using. They will in time become accustomed to the ideas of secession and disruption.

ST. PAUL'S.-The special Sunday evening services were commenced on January 4th. The Bishop of London preached the opening sermon, from Rev. i 19. The Cathedral was crowded to the doors.

UNION. The present appears to be a time of fraternizations. Thus the Bishop of Oxford and his friends wish to fraternize with the Greek church; Dr. Pusey advocates union between the church of England and the church of Rome, upon certain concessions being made by the latter; and strangest of all, the Rev. Archer Gurney, a noted High Churchman, writes to the "Patriot" to urge a union between Puseyites and Protestant dissenters to resist the very union that Dr. Pusey desires to see established. Of course Protestant dissenters who are worthy the name will consent to no union of the kind. They will remember the lesson taught them by that memorable passage in English history, when the church of England held out its hand to dissenters, to form a league to resist the Romish designs of the reigning monarch, and then rewarded them by enacting against them some of the severest laws under which they have ever suffered.

Druth.

BICKERS.-- Died at Laxfield, Suffolk, Dcc. 28th, 1865, Jonathan Bickers, aged 86 years; he was the senior deacon, and for more than 50 years a member of the Baptist Church in that place; during that long period his christian life was most exemplary. His end was peace.

INTOLERANCE.*

BY J. W. COLE.-HILLMORTON, RUGBY:

İNTOLERANCE, it is true, does not uproar its loathsome form in Britain as it does in some other countries that we could mention; for, in our land, as soon as it assumes anything like formidable proportions, the power of "the press " is brought to bear upon it, and it is crushed again to the dirty soil from which it arose.

But evils which, in one form, would be scouted from society are frequently allowed to develop themselves in other forms. Hence intolerance is still found lurking amongst our countrymen, as Bunyan's Diabolonians did in the town of Mansoul. We do not now rack men's bodies, for that would be a barbarism of the past; but we torture their minds, for the art of so doing is a refinement of the present; and upon this account the conscience of society never accuses it of cruelty; for, as no one ever saw mind, no person ever beheld it suffer; yet the look of scorn, the whisper of calumny, and even the consciousness of cold and undeserved neglect very frequently inflict a fearful amount of misery. Oh, what bitter tales could be told of intolerance! of the intolerance of religious sects, of the intolerance of political partisanship, of intolerance in families, in commerce, and in the various grades of social life. Households have been divided, tradesmen ruined, and kingdoms lost through it. And we cannot avoid believing that intolerance, in its more subtle forms, is often cherished by individuals who are loud in their denunciation of its grosser manifestations.

But let us not be misunderstood. While, with our whole hearts, we repudiate intolerance, in any shape, or under any circumstances, we have no sympathy with latitudinarianism and mock charity.

There are persons who, while they privately profess anxiety for the maintenance of particular principles which they esteem as truthful, publicly enter into confederation with those whom they regard as the disseminators of error. And this, forsooth, to show how much they desire christian union, as if amalgamation and love were synonymous terms. In the present day, we hear a great deal about, "The broad platform of christian truth." In our opinion, truth has no platform that can rightly be designated by the words "broad" and narrow." Truth was, is, and ever will be truth; and error was, is, and ever will be error. They may be combined, but they will not cohere; they may co-exist, but co-existence is no evidence of co-equality. Error and truth, in whatever positions they may be placed, are essentially antagonistic.

But it has been asked, "Does it not display a kindly spirit when men of different views form alliance with each other, and, for a time, mutually bury their minor disagreements?" It does appear to us that if a difference be necessary, the conviction which causes it ought not to be covered over merely for the sake of an apparent unity. A modern writer has thus tersely expressed his thoughts upon this matter: "It is not by the suppression, denial, or mystification of any of a man's convictions or modes of action for the sake of peace, or the general good, that a complete society can be realised on earth; but it is by the full and unrestrained action of the individual man, the free formation and utterance of a personal conviction, under the ruling mind and will of God, that true unity in society is to be gained." According to our judgment, true, manly tolerance is best displayed when differing parties neither bless one another at all, nor curse one another at all; but if persons honestly and intelligently hold the sentiments or doctrines which they profess, then do we think it incumbent upon them to use all spiritual, moral, and intellectual means for their promulgation.

That slight divergence of creed ought not to prevent free and friendly relationships, we are ready to admit; but we doubt whether fellowship of soul can be either generated or kept alive by mere outward bonds or wordy avowals of good will. Men may talk of arbitration for settling international disputes, and of evangelical alliances for producing christian union; but unless each one for himself strives to overcome the selfishness inherent in fallen humanity, all will be in vain. The union will be of one voice, but not of heart; and the ends for which such alliances are framed, and for which con ferences meet, will not be realized.

An extract from an unpublished Prize Essay on "The three greatest evils existing in Great Britain."

MARCH, 1866.

3

« PreviousContinue »