Page images
PDF
EPUB

The testimony that the Baptist gave to Christ.

105

xvi.

16

And to conclude: that we may be prepared for that final trial, SECT. let us be earnest in our applications to our gracious Redeemer, that as we are baptized with water in his name, he would also Ver. baptize us with the Holy Ghost and with fire; that, by the operations of his Holy Spirit on our cold and stupid hearts, he would enkindle and quicken that Divine life, that sacred love, that flaming, yet well-governed zeal for his glory, which distinguishes the true Christian from the hypocritical professor, and is indeed the seal of God set upon the heart to mark it for eternal happiness.

SECT. XVII.

The testimony John the Baptist gave to Christ is taken notice of by
John the Evangelist, and his own testimony added to confirm it.
John I. 15-18.

JOHN J. 15.

JOHN bare witness

JOHN I. 15.

of him, and cried, AS the Messiah now

ferred before me, he was before me:

for

xvii.

John

was shortly to appear, SECT. saying, This was he of and the time just at hand in which he was to whom I spake, He that enter on his public ministry, the way (as we have cometh after me is pre- seen) was opened for his coming by John the 1. 15. Baptist's being sent to preach the doctrine of repentance: and when the people came in crowds from every part to hear him, John bore his testimony of him in a public declaration of the dignity of his person and of the great design for which he was to come; which, though it was at first expressed in general terms, yet did he afterwards apply it in particular to Jesus of Nazareth, pointing him out to be the person he had spoken of; and, with an earnestness that suited the importance of this grand occasion, he openly proclaimed him to be the promised Messiah, and cried, saying, This is the person that I told you of; and this is he of whom I said before, (Mat. iii. 11.) He that cometh after me, as to

a This was he of whom I said.] This probably might happen at the time when Jesus made his first appearance among those that came to be baptized by John; when at his offering to receive his baptism; though John before had been a stranger to him, and knew him not by any personal acquaintance with him, yet, by some powerful impression on his mind, he presently discerned that this was he whom he before had taught the people to expect and of whose person he had given them so high a character. For it was plainly from his knowledge of him that John at first would have declined baptizing him, as an honour of which he looked upon himself to be unworthy. Nor is t to be doubted,

the

but that when he first knew the person,
of whose appearance he had raised such
expectations by his preaching, he would
immediately be ready to acquaint his
hearers that this was he who was intended
by him; which they themselves might have
been ready to conclude, from the uncom-
mon veneration and respect with which the
Baptist treated him who had been always
used to treat men with the greatest plainess.
And upon this account it may be proper
that this testimony of him should be intro-
duced (as I have placed it here) before the
particular account that the other evangelists
have given of his baptism. Compare Mat.
ii. 14. and John i. 27–30.

b He

106

xvii.

John

The testimony that the Baptist gave to Christ.

SECT. the time of his appearance in the world and of his entrance on the stage of public life, is upon all accounts superior to me, and is deservedly 1. 15. preferred before me; for, though indeed as to his human birth he is younger than me, and did not come into the world till a little after me, yet, in a much more noble and exalted kind of being he existed long before me, or even before the production of any creature whatsoever.

16

16 And of his ful

ceived, and grace for

And I John the apostle, who had the honour of being numbered among his most intimate ness have all we refriends would, with pleasure, in my own name, grace. and that of my brethren, add my testimony to that of the Baptist, as I and they have the greatest reason to do: for of his overflowing fulness have we all received whatever we possess, as men, as Christians, or as apostles; and he hath given us even grace upon grace, a rich abundance and variety of favours, which will ever make his name most dear and precious to our souls.

17 For the law was

given by Moses, but

grace and truth came

17 For the law was given by Moses, and we own
it an honour to our nation to have received it,
and to that holy man to have been the messenger by Jesus Christ.
of it; yet to the sinner it is a dispensation of
death, and passes an awful sentence of condem-
nation upon him: [but] the Redeemer whom we
celebrate is worthy of much more affectionate
regards; for grace and truth came by Jesus
Christ, who gives us an ample declaration of

b He existed long before me; wpuls .] This must undoubtedly refer to that state of glory in which Christ existed before his incarnation, of which the Baptist speaks so plainly, Jo. iii. 31. as abundantly to justify the paraphrase (compare note bon John i. 30. sect. 21.) As for the preceding clause, εμπροσθέν με γεγονεν, which we render, is preferred before me, I think Erasmus truly expresses the sense of it in supposing it to refer to those distinguishing honours which had been paid to Christ in his infancy, by prophets, sages and angels too, which nothing that had yet occurred in the life of John could by any means equal.

c I add my testimony to that of the Baptist.] It is most evident that what is said here in this verse, as Chrysostom justly observes, must be considered as the words of the evangelist. John the Baptist had never yet mentioned the name of Jesus; and the expression we all shews it could not be his words; for those to whom he addressed himself do not appear to have received grace

pardon

from Christ. The last French version, with great propriety, includes ver. 15 in a parenthesis, and so connects this 16th verse with the 14th ;-as if it had been said, He dwelt among us-full of grace and truth;—and of his fulness have we all received.

d Grace upon grace.] This seems the most easy sense of xagi ali xaçi, as T' anaranaç is grief upon grief. Theogn. v. 344.) Compare Ecclus. xxvi. 15-17. and see Blackwall's Sacred Classics, Vol. I. p. 164. Next to this I should prefer Grotius's interpretation, who would render it grace of mere grace: that is, the freest grace imaginable.

eCome by Jesus Christ.] I cannot lay so much stress on the word tyvel here, as opposed to don, as to suppose it, with Erasmus, to imply, that whereas Moses was only the messenger of the law, Christ was the original of the grace and truth he brought into the world by the gospel; since all that is intended by lo is nothing more than that it was, or that it came, by

Jesus

Reflections on the fulness of the grace of Christ.

18 No man hath seen God at any time; the Only - Begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath

declared him,

107

SECT.

xvii.

pardon and an abundant effusion of the Spirit,
those substantial blessings of which the Mosaic
dispensation was but a shadow.
His gospel John.
therefore should be received with the most cheer- I. 18.
ful consent; for no man hath ever seen God, nor
indeed can see him, as he is an incorporeal and
therefore an invisible Being; but the Only
Begotten Son, who is always in the bosom of the
Father, and ever favoured with the most en-
dearing and intimate converse with him, He hath
revealed and made him known in a much clearer
manner than he was before, by those discoveries
of his nature and will which may have the most
powerful tendency to form us to virtue and
happiness.

IMPROVEMENT.

HAPPY are they that (like this beloved apostle), when they Ver. hear the praises of Christ uttered by others, can echo back the 16 testimony from their own experience, as having themselves received of his fulness! May an abundance of grace be communicated from him to us! We are not straitened in him; oh, may we not be straitened in ourselves; but daily renewing our application to him as our Living Head, may vital influences be continually imparted to our souls from him!

With pleasure let us compare the dispensation of Jesus with 17 that of Moses, and observe the excellency of its superior grace and of its brighter truth: but let us remember, as a necessary consequence of this, that if the despisers of Moses's law died without mercy, they shall be thought worthy of a much sorer punishment and a more aggravated condemnation who tread under foot the Son of God. (Heb. x. 28, 29.)

May we ever regard him as the Only-Begotten of the Father; 18 and, since he hath condescended so far as to come down from his very bosom to instruct us in his nature and will, let us with all humility receive his dictates and earnestly pray that, under his revelations and teachings, we may so know God as faithfully to serve him now and, at length, eternally to enjoy him.

Jesus Christ, according to the sense in which the word is often used in other places; and dia here is used of Christ as well as of Moses: so that both are represented as messengers, though of very different dispensations.

f In the bosom of the Futher.] Critics generally agree this is one of the places in which is put for ; but had it here been rendered near his Father's bosom, it

SECT.

might as well have answered the design
of the original, and would, I think, have
been as expressive of that intimate converse
and entire friendship which the phrase im-
plies.-Elsner here cites a passage from
Plato concerning the regard due to the
authority of a Son of God when speaking
of his Father; and it is indeed surpri-
singly apposite. Elsn. Observ. Vol. I. p.
296.

a When

108

Christ comes to John from Nazareth in Galilee.

SECT.

xviii.

I. 9.

SECT. XVIII.

Christ is baptized by John, and the holy Spirit descends upon him in a visible form. Mark I. 9-11. Mat. III. 13. to the end; Luke III. 21—23.

MARK I. 9.

AND it came to pass in those days, when great
numbers of all ranks and professions among

retired а

MARK I. 9.

AND it came to

[LUKE, when all the pass in those days

Mark the Jewish people were baptized, that Jesus people were baptized] came from the town of Nazareth in Galilee, that Jesus came from Nazareth of Galilee where he had lived for many years in [unto John, to be manner with his parents, to the river Jordan; baptized of him] and and applied himself to John, that he might be bap- was baptized of John in Jordan. [MAT. III. tized by him and was accordingly baptized by 13. LUKE III. 21. John in Jordan, near Bethabara; (see John i. 28. sect. 20.)

14

MAT. III. 14. But John forbade him, say

Now the providence of God had so ordered it, to prevent all appearance of a combination ing, I have need to be between them, that John was personally a baptized of thee, and stranger to Christ. (John i. 33.) But neverthe- comest thou to me? less, as soon as he saw him, he received a secret intimation from above that this was the Messiah upon whom the Spirit should visibly descend; (see the note on Jolin i. 33. sect. 21.) And, upon this account, such was the modesty of John that he was ready to decline the service, and would

a When all the people were baptized.] John continued baptizing so long after this, that it is very evident the word all must be taken with the restriction used in the paraphrase, as it is oftentimes in other places.

b Jesus came from Nazareth in Galilee.] The learned Dr. Thomas Jackson, in his elaborate examination of this context (see his works, vol. II. p. 515-519), supposes that John the Baptist, inquiring into and hearing the name of Jesus, and the place from whence he came, and comparing it in his own mind with that celebrated prophecy, Isa. xi. 1, 2. concluded that this Jesus, or Divine Saviour, as the word may signify (see noted on Mat. i. 21. p. 52.) coming from Nazareth, the town of Rods, as the etymology of that name imports, was the rod out of the stem of Jesse, upon whom the Spirit should descend, and rest like a dove on a branch. And thus he would reconcile John's address to Christ as so extraordinary a person, Mat. iii. 14, with his declaring (John i. 31, 33.) that he knew him not before: but this seems a very precarious solution, considering how possible

have

it might be that in so large a place as Nazareth there might be several persons of the name of Jesus or Joshua, so very common among the Jews. It appears therefore much more reasonable to have recourse to the solution given in the paraphrase and note d on the last cited text, sect. 21. that he had a secret intimation given him who it was that came to be baptized by him; and all that this very ingenious writer has said to shew the various marks by which John might know Christ, without supposing such a particular revelation as is there suggested, does but confirm me the more in the necessity of admitting it.

That he might be baptized by him.] By this he intended to do an honour to John's ministry, and to conform himself to what he appointed to his followers: for which last reason it was that he drank likewise of the sacramental cup. And this we may consider as a plain argument that baptism may be administered to those who are not capable of all the purposes for which it was designed. See Dr. Whitby's note on Mat. iii. 16.

d The

15 And Jesus answering, said unto him, for thus it becometh us to fulfil all righte

Suffer it to be so now;

ousness. Then he suffered him.

16 And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of

And is baptized by John in Jordan.

109

SECT.

xviii.

have hindered him from doing what he proposed;
and accordingly said unto him, Thou art so much
my superior, that I have need to be baptized by Mat.
thee with that 'far nobler baptism which thou III. 14.
art to administer! and dost thou come to me on
such an occasion as this? I am confounded at
the thought, and cannot but consider it as too
high an honour for me.
And Jesus, replying, 15
said unto him, Though it be really as thou sayest,
yet do not go about to hinder me, but permit
[it] now; for, however unable thou mayest be
at present to enter into the particular reasons of
it, yet, in submission to the Divine appoint-
ments, it is decent for us thus to comply with
all the duties of religion, and in this manner it
becomes us to fulfil all righteousness and upon
this account, as it is a part of my duty to attend
this institution, it is therefore a part of thine to
administer it. Then, as John knew that it be-
came him not to debate the matter any farther,
he permitted him to be baptized.

And after Jesus was baptized, as soon as he 16
the water: and, lo, the ascended out of the water to the bank of Jordan,
heavens were opened behold, the heavens were immediately opened un-
unto him [LUKE, be- to him, and in a wondrous way appeared as if
ing baptized, and pray-
ing,] and he saw the they had been rent asunder directly over his
Spirit of God descend- head: and at that very instant, as he was looking
ly shape] like a dove, up, and praying in a devout and holy rapture;
and lighting upon him, and as John was also fixing his eyes upon this
[MARK I. 10. LUKE wonderful sight, he saw the Spirit of God, in a
III. 21, 22.]
corporeal form, as a glorious and splendid ap-
pearance of fire, descending with a hovering

ing [LUKE, in a bodi

d The heavens were immediately opened.] I think it plain (as Grotius and Blackwall have observed) that what is here intended is to intimate, that directly on his coming up out of the water the heavens were opened: for it must certainly appear to be a circumstance of small importance, and of very little use, for the evangelist to say that Jesus went up straightway out of the water after he was baptized; but, if we take it in the other way, it very fitly introduces the remarkable account of what directly followed it. There seems to be such a transposition of the word ws, Mark i. 29. and xi. 2. See Blackwall's Sacred Classics, Vol. I. p. 89.

e As he was praying.] It is observable that all the three voices from heaven, by which the Father bore witness to Christ, were pronounced while he was praying, or very quickly after it. Compare Luke ix. 29.-35. and John xii. 28.

He saw the Spirit of God.] There is

VOL. VI.

motion

no question to be made but that this won-
drous sight was seen by both of them: for
Mark has so expressed it as plainly to
refer the seeing it to Christ; and John the
Baptist has in another place assured us that
he saw it, and took particular notice of it
as the sign he was directed to observe as the
distinguishing and certain characteristic of
the Messiah. John i. 32-34, And I have
therefore so expressed it in the paraphrase,
as not directly to confine the sight of it to
either.

g In a corporeal form.] This is the ex-
act English of σωματικω είδει ; a phrase,
which might with propriety have been
used, though there had not been (as most
understand it) any appearance in the shape
of the animal here mentioned, but only a
lambent flame falling from heaven with a
hovering dove-like motion, which Dr. Scott
(in his Christian Life, Vol. III, p. 66)
supposes to have been all. Dr. Owen and

[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »