« PreviousContinue »
13. By the same fruits shall you distinguish this voice of God, from any delusion of the Devil. That proud spirit cannot humble thee before God. He neither can nor would soften thy heart, and melt it first into earnest mourning after God, and then into filial love. It is not the adversary of God and man, that enables thee to love thy neighbour ; or to put on meekness, gentleness, patience, temperance, and the whole armour of God. He is not divided against himself, or a destroyer of sin, his own work. No; it is none but the Son of God who cometh “ to destroy the works of the Devil.” As surely therefore as holiness is of God, and as sin is the work of the Devil, so surely the witness thou hast in thyself is not of Satan, but of God.
14. Well then mayest thou say, “ Thanks be unto God for his unspeakable gift !” Thanks be unto God, who giveth me to “know in whom I have believed;” who bath “sent forth the Spirit of his Son into my heart, crying, Abba, Father,” and even now,“ bearing witness with my spirit that I am a child of God!" And see, that not only thy lips, but thy life, show forth his praise, He hath sealed thee for his own; glorify him then in thy body and thy spirit, which are his. Beloved, if thou hast this hope in thyself, purify thyself as he is pure. While thou beholdest what manner of love the Father hath given thee, that thou shouldest be called a child of God; cleanse thyself “from all filthiness of flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God ;” and let all thy thoughts, words, and works be a spiritual sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God through Christ Jesus !
THE WITNESS OF THE SPIRIT.
“ The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are
the children of God." Rom. viii. 16.
1. I. None who believe the Scriptures to be the Word of God, can doubt the importance of such a truth as this ;-a truth revealed therein, not once only, not obscurely, not incidentally; but frequently, and that in express ternus; but solemnly and of set purpose, as denoting one of the peculiar privileges of the children of God,
2. And it is the more necessary to explain and defend this truth, because there is a danger on the right hand and on the Jeft. If we deny it, there is a danger lest our religion degenerate into mere formality : lest, “having a form of godliness,” We neglect, if not “ deny the power of it.” If we allow it, but do not understand what ire allow, we are liable to run into all the wildness of enthusiasm. It is therefore nccdful, in the highest degree, to guard those who fear God from both these dangers, by a scriptural and rational illustration and confirmation of this momentous truth.
3. It may seem, something of this kivd is the more needful, because so little has been wrote on the sulijcct with any
clearness; unless some discourses on the wrong side of the question, which explain it quite away. And it cannot be doubted, but these were occasioned, at least in a great measure, by the crude, muscriptural, irrational explication of others, who “knew not what they spake, nor whereof they affirmou.”
4. It more nearly concerns the Methodists, 50 called, clearly to understand, explain, and defend this doctrine; because it is one grand part of the Testimony, which God has given
them to bear to all mankind. It is by his peculiar blessing upon them in searching the Scriptures, confirmed by the experience of his children, that this great evangelical truth has been recovered, which had been for many years well nigh lost and forgotten.
II. 1. But what is the Witness of the Spirit ? The original word uzętupie, may be rendered either (as it is in several places) the witness, or less ambiguously, the testimony, or the record : so it is rendered in our translation, (1 John v. 11,) “ This is the record,” [the testiniony, the sum of what God testifies in all the inspired writings,] “ that God hath given unto us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.” The testimony now under consideration is given by the Spirit of God to and with our spirit: he is the Person testifying. What he testifies to us is, “ that we are the children of God.” The immediate result of this testimony is, “ the fruit of the Spirit ; ” namely, “love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness:” and without these, the testimony itself cannot continue. For it is inevitably destroyed, not only by the commission of any outward sin, or the omission of known duty, but by giving way to any inward sin; in a word, by whatever grieves the Holy Spirit of God.
2. I observed many years ago, “It is hard to find words in the language of men, to explain the deep things of God. Indeed there are none that will adequately express what the Spirit of God works in his children. But perhaps one might say, (desiring any who are taught of God, to correct, soften, or strengthen the expression,) By the Testimony of the Spirit, I mean, an inward impression on the soul, whereby the Spirit of God immediately and directly witnesses to my spirit, that I am a child of God; that Jesus Christ hath loved me, and given himself for me; that all my sins are blotted out, and I, even I, am reconciled to God.”
3. After twenty years' further consideration, I see no cause to retract any part of this. Neither do I conceive, how any of these expressions may be altered, so as to make them more intelligible. I can only add, that if any of the children of God will point out any other expressions, which are more clear, or more agreeable to the Word of God, I will readily lay these aside.
4. Meantime let it be observed, I do not mean hereby, that the Spirit of God testifies this by any outward voice ; no,
nor always by an inward voice, although he may do this sometimes. Neither do I suppose, that he always applies to the heart, (though hic often may,) one or more texts of Scripture. But he so works upon the soul by his immediate influence, and by a strong, though inexplicable operation, that the stormy wind and troubled waves subside, and there is a sweet calm ; the heart resting as in the arms of Jesus, and the sinner being clearly satisfied that God is reconciled, that all his “iniquities arc forgiven, and his sins covered.''
5. Now what is the matter of dispute concerning this ? Not whether there be a witness or testimony of the Spirit ? Not whether the Spirit does testify with our spirit, that we are the children of God ? None can deny this, without flatly contradicting the Scriptures, and charging a lie npon the God of truth. Therefore that there is a testimony of the Spirit, is acknowledged by all parties.
6. Neither is it questioned, whether there is an indirect witness, or testimony, that we are the children of God. This is ncarly, if not exactly, the same with the testimony of a good conscience towards God; and is the result of reason, or reflection on what we feel in our own souls. Strictly speaking, it is a conclusion drawn partly from the Word of God, and partly from our own experience. The Word of God says, every one who has the fruit of the Spirit is a child of God; experience, or inward consciousness, tells me, that I have the fruit of the Spirit; and lience I rationally conclude, therefore I am a child of God. This is likewisc allowed on all hands, and so is no matter of controversy.
7. Nor do we assert, that there can be any rcal testimony of the Spirit without the fruit of the Spirit. We assert, on the contrary, that the fruit of the Spirit inmediately springs from this testimony; not always indeed in the same degree, cren when the testimony is first given ; and much less afterwards. Neither joy mor peace is always at one stay; no, nor love ; as peither is the testimony itself always equally strong and clear.
8. But the point in question is, Whether there be any (lirect testimony of the Spirit at all ? Whether there be any other testimony of the Spirit, thau that which arises from a consciousness of the fruit ?
JII. 1. I believe there is; because that is the plain, natural meaning of the test, “The Spirit in df beareth witness with our pirit, that it will the children of Cere.'' li in manitost,
here are two witnesses mentioned, who together testify the same thing; the Spirit of God, and our own spirit. The late Bishop of London, in his sermon on this text, scems astonished that any one can doubt of this, which appears upon the very face of the words. Now, “ The testimony of our own spirit (says the Bishop) is one, which is the consciousness of our own sincerity;" or to express the same thing a little more clearly, the consciousness of the fruit of the Spirit. When our spirit is conscious of this, of love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, it easily infers from these premises, that we are the children of God.
2. It is true, that great man supposes the other witness to be, "The consciousness of our own good works.” This, he affirms, is the testimony of God's Spirit. But this is included in the testimony of our own spirit; yea, and in sincerity, even according to the common sense of the word. So the Apostle,
, “Our rejoicing is this, the testimony of our conscience, that in simplicity and godly sincerity we have had our conversation in the world :” where it is plain, sincerity refers to our words and actions, at least as much as to our inward dispositions. So that this is not another witness, but the very same that he mentioned before ; the consciousness of our good works being only one branch of the consciousness of our sincerity. Consequently here is only one witness still. If therefore the text speaks of two witnesses; one of these is not the consciousness of our good works; neither of our sincerity; all this being manifestly contained in the testimony of our spirit.
3. What then is the other Witness ? This might easily be Icarned, if the text itself were not sufficiently clear, from the verse immediately preceding : “ Ye have received, not the Spirit of bondage, but the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father.”- It follows, “The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God.”
4. This is farther explained by the parallel text, (Gal. iv. 6,) “Because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.” Is not this something immediate and direct, not the result of reflection or argumentation? Does not this Spirit cry, “ Abba, Father,” in our hearts, the moment it is given, antecedently to any reflection upon our sincerity; yea, to any reasoning whatsoever ? And is not this the plain, natural sensc of the words, which strikes any one as soon as he hcars them? All these texts then, in their