One Earth, One People: The Mythopoeic Fantasy Series of Ursula K. Le Guin, Lloyd Alexander, Madeleine L'Engle and Orson Scott CardThis work presents the genre of mythopoeic fantasy from a holistic perspective, arguing that this central genre of fantasy literature is largely misunderstood as a result of decades of incomplete and reductionist literary studies. The author asserts that mythopoeic fantasy is not only the most complete literary expression of a worldview based on the existence of supernatural or spiritual powers but that the genre is in a unique position to transform social consciousness with a renewed emphasis on anticipating the future. The author lays out theoretical foundations for his argument in the first four chapters and then demonstrates how the works of fantasy authors Ursula K. LeGuin, Lloyd Alexander, Madeleine L'Engle, and Orson Scott Card exemplify his argument in the remaining four chapters. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 47
Page 61
In naming the genre , his friend C.S. Lewis was more fortunate for in 1952 — fourteen years after Tolkien's attempt - he ... Except for more explicitly linking it with myth and mythic storytelling , Lewis's definition of the genre is ...
In naming the genre , his friend C.S. Lewis was more fortunate for in 1952 — fourteen years after Tolkien's attempt - he ... Except for more explicitly linking it with myth and mythic storytelling , Lewis's definition of the genre is ...
Page 62
I do not know why Lewis did not follow his own intimations about the working of mythopoeia in fantasy literature . Although he clearly was , as Jared Lobdell asserts in his 2004 The Scientifiction Novels of C.S. Lewis , “ responsible ...
I do not know why Lewis did not follow his own intimations about the working of mythopoeia in fantasy literature . Although he clearly was , as Jared Lobdell asserts in his 2004 The Scientifiction Novels of C.S. Lewis , “ responsible ...
Page 65
Although Tolkien's achievement in this respect has been thrown into sharper relief that that of Lewis's , it is unwise to ... That the affinities between Tolkien's and Lewis's work - especially their mythopoeic roots - eclipse the ...
Although Tolkien's achievement in this respect has been thrown into sharper relief that that of Lewis's , it is unwise to ... That the affinities between Tolkien's and Lewis's work - especially their mythopoeic roots - eclipse the ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Acknowledgments | 1 |
The Confusion over Fantasy and the Confusions of | 7 |
Theoretical Era | 13 |
Copyright | |
10 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Alexander Alexander's Alvin American approach argued asserts authors becomes believe called Card Card's century chapter characters Christian claims concept concerned consciousness continue criticism cultural definition Earthsea elements especially essay ethical example existence experience explored expression fact fiction finally future genre Guin Guin's holistic human idea imaginative important individual integral kind knowledge L’Engle L’Engle's land Le Guin Lewis literary literature live matter means mind mode moral myth mythic mythology mythopoeic fantasy narrative nature past perhaps perspective philosophy physical poetic position present proposed psychological quest readers reality reductionist reflects religion religious represent says seen sense social society speaks specific spiritual story structure suggest supernatural Taran theory things tion Tolkien tradition true truth understanding universe vision Welsh whole Wind worldview writing