 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1866 - 616 pages
...payee, as assignee of the drawer, may now maintain the action, under the Statute of 1863, authorizing the assignee of a chose in action to sue in his own name. I do not think the question whether a check can, in any case, operate as an assignment, by the drawer,... | |
 | Theophilus Parsons - Consideration (Law) - 1866 - 818 pages
...an earlier Virginia case. The latter case simply decided that the statute of Virginia, authorizing the assignee of a chose in action to sue in his own name, did not take from the Court of Chancery the jurisdiction which it fonnerly had. There seems to have... | |
 | Law - 1884 - 550 pages
...the debts are negotiable promissory notes or if the law of the Slate In which the action is brought permits the assignee of a chose in action to sue in his own name. Harper v. Butler, 2 Pet. 239; Shaw, CJ, in Rand v. Hubbard, 4 Met. 252, 258-260; Petersen v. Chemical Bank, 32 NY 21. And on a note... | |
 | Law - 1889 - 546 pages
...burden of the mortgagee's lien regardless of notice. It cannot be claimed that the statute anthorizing the assignee of a chose in action to sue in his own name applies, for under such statute in New York it has been repeatedly held that the assignee's title is... | |
 | William A. Shinn - Bankruptcy - 1875 - 624 pages
...maintain an action thereon in his own name in a State court, where the laws of the State do not permit an assignee of a chose in action to sue in his own name. — Leach v. Greene, 377. 8. C. brought a suit against the Express Company to recover damages for loss... | |
 | Nathan Howard (Jr.), Rowland M. Stover - Civil procedure - 1879 - 668 pages
...Code (sec. 111) as the real parties in interest. One great object of this provision was to enable an assignee of a chose in action to sue in his own name, and it would be placing a construction upon this provision which is, I think, unwarranted to hold that... | |
 | Austin Abbott - Civil procedure - 1880 - 658 pages
...Code (§ 111) as the real parties in interest. One great object of this provision was to enable an assignee of a chose in action to sue in his own name, and it would be placing a construction upon this provision which is, I think, unwarranted, to hold... | |
 | Francis Wharton - Conflict of laws - 1881 - 878 pages
...for them ; and thus he becomes personally entitled to sue in foreign lands. 2 And when the local law permits the assignee of a chose in action to sue in his own name, an assignment by an administrator will enable his assignee to sue in another state without taking out... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1883 - 1004 pages
...the debts are negotiable promissory notes, or if the law of the state in which the action is brought permits the assignee of a chose in action to sue in his own name. Harper v. Butler, 2 Pet. 239; SHAW, CJ, in Rand v. Hubbard, 4 Mete. 252, 258-260 ; Peterson v. Chemical Bank, 32 NY 21. And on a... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Courts - 1884 - 666 pages
...the debts are negotiable promissory notes, or if the law of the State in which the action is brought permits the assignee of a chose in action to sue in his own name. Harper v. Butler, 2 Pet. 239 ; Shaw, CJ, in Sand v. Hubbard, 4 Met. 252, 258-260 ; Petersen v. Chemical Bank, 32 NY 21. And on a... | |
| |
State in which the action is brought permits the assignee of a chose in action to sue in his own name. 
