The Gospel According to St. Luke: An Introduction and CommentaryWriting from a conservative evangelical position, the author is careful to incorporate the findings of the latest Biblical scholarship while refraining from polemic. A substantial introduction, treating the relationship between the first three Gospels, is followed by a verse-by-verse commentary on the text of Luke. Also included is a brief section on the language of the original, and a more extended discussion of Luke as a theologian. As an appendix, the author provides a table of parallel passages in the other Synoptics, enabling the reader to see at a glance what material is peculiar to Luke. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 87
Page 17
... seems generally agreed now that there was no special technical medical language in our sense of the term , for writers such as Hippocrates and Galen seem to have used the ordinary language of educated men . But if Cadbury has made it ...
... seems generally agreed now that there was no special technical medical language in our sense of the term , for writers such as Hippocrates and Galen seem to have used the ordinary language of educated men . But if Cadbury has made it ...
Page 53
... seems more original . Thus it does not seem likely that either of these Gospels depends directly on the other . Most scholars hold that such a source as Q existed , though there is little agreement as to what was in it . James Moffatt ...
... seems more original . Thus it does not seem likely that either of these Gospels depends directly on the other . Most scholars hold that such a source as Q existed , though there is little agreement as to what was in it . James Moffatt ...
Page 58
... seem never to have given a convincing explanation of two facts : 1. Luke habitually combines his special matter with Q , but never with Mark , and 2. Luke departs from Mark so often in the passion story . He seems to have attached great ...
... seem never to have given a convincing explanation of two facts : 1. Luke habitually combines his special matter with Q , but never with Mark , and 2. Luke departs from Mark so often in the passion story . He seems to have attached great ...
Contents
CHIEF ABBREVIATIONS | 9 |
Luke the Theologian | 28 |
The Relationship of Luke to the other Gospels | 47 |
Copyright | |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
¹See Acts angels Aramaic asked attitude baptism bring called Christ Christian church clear coming death demons denarius disciples eschatological Evangelists evidence evil fact faith father followers forgiveness Form Critics Galilee Gentiles give God's Gospel Gospel of Luke Greek healing Herod Holy Spirit important Jerusalem Jewish Jews John John's Josephus kingdom London looked Lord Luke tells Luke's Marcan Mary Matthew and Luke Matthew and Mark means meant Messiah ministry miracle Mishnah narrative Old Testament parable passages Passover perhaps Peter Pharisees Pilate pray prayer preaching priests probably prophecy prophets question reference rejected repentance resurrection rich Romans sabbath Sadducees salvation Sanhedrin scholars scribes Scripture seems Septuagint shows simply sinners sins slave speaks steward story synagogue Synoptic Synoptic Gospels Synoptic Problem Synoptists teaching Temple things thought tion took verb verse woman words Zacchaeus Zechariah