The Gospel According to St. Luke: An Introduction and CommentaryWriting from a conservative evangelical position, the author is careful to incorporate the findings of the latest Biblical scholarship while refraining from polemic. A substantial introduction, treating the relationship between the first three Gospels, is followed by a verse-by-verse commentary on the text of Luke. Also included is a brief section on the language of the original, and a more extended discussion of Luke as a theologian. As an appendix, the author provides a table of parallel passages in the other Synoptics, enabling the reader to see at a glance what material is peculiar to Luke. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 89
Page 49
... Mark are as follows : 1. Almost the whole of Mark is contained in the other two . Matthew has the substance of more than 600 of Mark's 661 verses and he retains about 51 % of Mark's actual words even though his style is more condensed ...
... Mark are as follows : 1. Almost the whole of Mark is contained in the other two . Matthew has the substance of more than 600 of Mark's 661 verses and he retains about 51 % of Mark's actual words even though his style is more condensed ...
Page 56
... Mark as basic and inserted his non - Marcan matter into the Marcan framework . But Streeter breaks with the view that Mark was a primary source for Luke and he denies that Mark provided Luke's framework . Caird points out that the ...
... Mark as basic and inserted his non - Marcan matter into the Marcan framework . But Streeter breaks with the view that Mark was a primary source for Luke and he denies that Mark provided Luke's framework . Caird points out that the ...
Page 57
... Mark.1 It is difficult in the light of this to see Mark as Luke's framework . 5. This hypothesis would explain why Luke omits so much more of Mark than does Matthew . 6. The use of ' the Lord ' rather than ' Jesus ' in narrative is not ...
... Mark.1 It is difficult in the light of this to see Mark as Luke's framework . 5. This hypothesis would explain why Luke omits so much more of Mark than does Matthew . 6. The use of ' the Lord ' rather than ' Jesus ' in narrative is not ...
Contents
CHIEF ABBREVIATIONS | 9 |
Luke the Theologian | 28 |
The Relationship of Luke to the other Gospels | 47 |
Copyright | |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
The Gospel According to St. Luke: An Introduction and Commentary Leon Morris No preview available - 1974 |
Common terms and phrases
šSee Acts angels Aramaic asked attitude baptism bring called Christ Christian church clear coming death demons denarius disciples eschatological Evangelists evidence evil fact faith father followers forgiveness Form Critics Galilee Gentiles give God's Gospel Gospel of Luke Greek healing Herod Holy Spirit important Jerusalem Jewish Jews John John's Josephus kingdom London looked Lord Luke tells Luke's Marcan Mary Matthew and Luke Matthew and Mark means meant Messiah ministry miracle Mishnah narrative Old Testament parable passages Passover perhaps Peter Pharisees Pilate pray prayer preaching priests probably prophecy prophets question reference rejected repentance resurrection rich Romans sabbath Sadducees salvation Sanhedrin scholars scribes Scripture seems Septuagint shows simply sinners sins slave speaks steward story synagogue Synoptic Synoptic Gospels Synoptic Problem Synoptists teaching Temple things thought tion took verb verse woman words Zacchaeus Zechariah