The human life bill: hearings before the Subcommittee on Separation of Powers of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-seventh Congress, first session, on S. 158 ... April 23, 24, May 20, 21, June 1, 10, 12, and 18
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1982
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
20510 Dear Senator abortion actual American answer attempt become begins believe bill birth cell Center child conception concerning Congress considered constitutional continue contraception Dear Senator Baucus death decision define definition Department determine effect enacted ethical evidence exists fact federal feel fertilized fetus Fourteenth Amendment genetic human personhood impact important individual infant interest issue June legislation letter limited living majority matter meaning medical and scientific medicine Member Minority moral mother opinion organization person philosophical physicians political population position potential practice pregnancy present problems Professor proposed protection question reason regarding religious reproductive require response result risk School scientific Senate Washington Senator Max Baucus Separation of Powers Sincerely social society statute Subcommittee on Separation Supreme Court term termination United States Senate University woman women York
Page 172 - Maternity, or additional offspring, may force upon the woman a distressful life and future. Psychological harm may be imminent. Mental and physical health may be taxed by child care. There is also the distress, for all concerned, associated with the unwanted child, and there is the problem of bringing a child into a family already unable, psychologically and otherwise, to care for it. In other cases, as in this one, the additional difficulties and continuing stigma of unwed motherhood may be involved....
Page 171 - Specific and direct harm medically diagnosable even in early pregnancy may be involved. Maternity, or additional offspring, may force upon the woman a distressful life and future. Psychological harm may be imminent. Mental and physical health may be taxed by child care.
Page 855 - It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is." This decision declared the basic principle that the federal judiciary is supreme in the exposition of the law of the Constitution...
Page 288 - No unborn person shall be deprived of life by any person; provided, however, that nothing in this article shall prohibit a law permitting only those medical procedures required to prevent the death of the mother.
Page 800 - Limitations of this kind can be preserved in practice no other way than through the medium of courts of justice, whose duty it must be to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the constitution void. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights or privileges would amount to nothing.
Page 839 - This right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or, as the District Court determined, in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.
Page 788 - Contrary to the suggestion of the dissent, post, p. 668, § 5 does not grant Congress power to exercise discretion in the other direction and to enact "statutes so as in effect to dilute equal protection and due process decisions of this Court.
Page 87 - The appellee and certain amici argue that the fetus is a "person" within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. In support of this they outline at length and in detail the well-known facts of fetal development. If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case, of course, collapses, for the fetus' right to life is then guaranteed specifically by the Amendment.