Leads up to thee. Healing thy garment fills, IV. The Persian king, from arm'd Abdera's rocks, Welcome their hate; the good which they dispense VI. Therefore to you the choirs of heav'n arise How may we praise-how style you? call'd alone It is worthy of notice, that in each of the accounts of both of these miracles, a circumstance, apparently trivial, is recorded, "that he gave to his disciples," and they to the multitude. That these miracles had a typical reference to the holy communion is obvious from the ensuing conversation, which St. John records, John, vi. From Christ's meek cradle to his throne on high? VII. So not alone Christ's mission-crown on high Makes lowliest hearts his temple; such we see And round th' all-conquering Cross of shame discern, Thence, high and wide, 'mid Persecution's night, VIII. "He that despiseth you doth me despise." The dust of Time is on him, and Christ's mark, Worldly reproach; he bears the unquench'd spark To kindle into life earth's secret womb To lighten or destroy, cheer or consume; Through chains, fire, sword, he bears thy last reprieve, "He that receiveth you, doth me receive!" THE ANCIENT BRITISH CHURCH AND MODERN SCHISMS. 1. ALAS! Menevia, what of thee remains, Some mountain bird now hides his sylvan food. Bowing to each wind as it passes by. II. Ancient Menevia, I must still love thee. Though nought to echo back her solemn tongue, To enshrine the feverish dreams of human will- For thou didst take me up unto thy breast, And didst engraft me in the living tree. Still breathe fresh thoughts from thy Plinlimmon's crest; Still thine own language, in thy mountain nest, (Indented oft with blue o'erarching sea,) Keeps thee from airs of foul disloyalty. Fam'd by the press from England's sad unrest, Which, like Avernian steams, to heaven's deep roof Daily ascend, and gathering there aloof, Hang in tempestuous clouds, if thou wouldst still THANKFULNESS TO GOD, I. THE clear blue sky, the glorious sun, The sweetness of the summer air, Rich lights, deep shades, scenes soft and fair, Have I enjoyed, and loved all these, And, like a beast, like a dull sod, Warmed by the ray it cannot shun, II. Dear friends! and kindred's dearer ties! When the warm heart o'erflows the eyes! O God! have I thus thankless proved, J. H. B. M. CORRESPONDENCE. The Editor begs to remind his readers that he is not responsible for the opinions BAPTISM DURING SERVICE. DEAR SIR,-Having for some time been an attentive reader of your Magazine, I have been disappointed to find, that while points of far less importance in our rubric directions have been discussed at length, no notice has been taken of a practice which seems likely to undermine, (as it has already undermined in the ideas of many) the whole system of baptismal ceremonies by which our church has endeavoured to secure to every infant baptized by her all those blessings which are necessary to a continuance and growth in grace and holiness. The practice to which I refer consists in allowing the nurse, or any other person, to bring the child to church to be named, without any appearance or thought of sponsors, and without anything more than one or two collects used in the vestry-room; after which the infant is named and registered, and the whole business is finished and done. This is the practice in our parish; in other places so much of the office for the public baptism of infants is used as does not imply the presence of sponsors, but still the ceremony is perfunctorily gone through, after the services of the church are finished, and when no one remains in the sacred building besides the clergyman, the clerk, and the nursemaid, or some friend of the infant. But as to the idea of performing the ceremony, and causing the infant to make (through the mouth of its sponsors) its "solemn vow, promise, and profession" of Christianity, in the public congregation, according to the directions of the rubric,-all this would be tedious beyond bearing,'-' would be offensive to dissenters,' would be impossible in so large a parish,'or would be a great hardship upon the poorer classes, who have great difficulty in providing sponsors, in the first place, and in providing for them (a feast) in the next,' &c. &c. Such, Mr. Editor, are some of the reasons which have been urged in defence of an indefensible transgression of both the rubric and the whole tone, spirit, and intention of our baptismal services for infants, as well as of the catechism put forth by authority "to be learned of every person before he be brought to be confirmed by the bishop." VOL. XI.-June, 1837. 40 Though, therefore, any reasoning on the subject is, strictly speaking, inadmissible as an excuse for such a flagrant act of canonical disobedience, still I would crave room to glance seriatim at the allegations advanced. 1. It would be tedious.' I ask, to whom?-to the congregation, or to yourself? If you say, it would be tedious to yourself, which I suspect may be the truth, I have nothing to answer, but must leave you to "excuse or else accuse" yourself as best you may to God, your conscience, and your church, for taking upon yourself the obligations and solemn responsibility of a minister, and yet breaking the clearest rule of duty upon such a frivolous, not say scandalous, equivocation. But if you say that it would be tedious to the congregation, I ask how you have ascertained that fact? I feel confident that no congregation, rightly instructed in the word of God, and in the meaning of our baptismal services, would think the short intervention of an innocent candidate for the membership of Christ's church a tedious or even an uninteresting ceremony. I remember, in the time of the late curate, (and I suppose the same practice is still observed,) that the congregation of Kidlington church appeared particularly interested and gratified (how could it be otherwise?) by the short, but solemnly pleasing, intervention of "the ministration of the public baptism of" an infant, which took place immediately after the second lesson of the evening service. The sponsors were accosted as in a really earnest transaction, and they answered audibly respecting the articles of belief and practice which they undertook for the child. I was then a layman, and with two others had strayed from Oxford to the village church; and I can truly say, that neither myself nor my companions felt the least tedium, bat on the contrary, there was a mutual expression of gratification forced from us all on the occasion. Moreover, being rather later than we expected, we had an opportunity of ob serving, that scarcely a soul was left at home after the church bells had ceased; the whole village appeared with one heart and one mind to have met their respected minister, "with one accord to offer up their common supplications" unto "the throne of the heavenly grace.' This proves that it is not necessary, even to popularity, to break through these baptismal rubrics of our church. So much for the tedium of baptism. 2. But it would offend dissenters.' Admirable doctrine! exquisite reason! ἦ κεν γηθήσαι Πριαμος, Πριαμοιο τε παιδες : and are, then, the dissenters conciliated by our breaking our own church rules to please them? Nay, nay, Mr. Dissenter, do you not, as soon as you have turned your back upon our vestry services, laugh to scorn our bending accommodation, and declare that we would break any of our rules for the sake of being called the state church, and of receiving the fees of office? To be sure you do. Besides, what excuse can there be now, when the new registration act comes into force, for dissenters, in desecrating our holy offices down to the point which happens to suit the notions of those who, after the pearl has been cast before them, are ready to turn and rend us? The dissenters! I would pray for them as a body, or bodies; and I would love and do every civil |