Bombay High Court Reports.

VOLUME VIII.

REPORTS OF CASES

DECIDED IN THE

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY.

1871.

EDITED BY

CHARLES F. FARRAN, B.A.,

(Of the Middle Temple,)

BARRISTER-AT-LAW.

Bombay:

PRINTED AT THE

EDUCATION SOCIETY'S PRESS, BYCULLA.

1872.

NAMES OF REPORTERS.

Original Cibil Jurisdiction.

CHARLES F. FARRAN, B.A., BARRISTER-AT-LAW.

Appellate Civil Jurisdiction.

KHANDERA'V CHIMANRA'V BEDA'RKAR, B.A., LL.B.

MAHADEV GOVIND RA'NADE, M.A., LL.B.

VISHNU GHANASHA'M.

Crown Cases.

CHARLES F. FARRAN, B.A. BARRISTER-AT-LAW.

KHANDERAV CHIMANRA'V BEDA'RKAR, B.A., LL.B.

VISHNU GHANASHA'M.

TABLE

OF

CASES REPORTED

IN THIS VOLUME.

Arlápá Náyak v. Narsi Keshavji & Co.

Asiatic Banking Corporation v. Amador Viegas et al.

Bábá Saheb Dámaskár's case

Bái Kesar v. Bái Ganga

Bái Kúvar v. Venidás Gangárám

Bái Súraj v. The Government of Bombay et al.

180

64

83

Balkrishna Govind Gadgil v. Nárayan Sakhárám et al..........A.C.J.
Balkrishna Vithal et al. v. Hari Shankar et al. .....

.......A.C.J.

Bápubhái Khusháldás et al. v. Pái Suraj and the Government of
Bombay

..A.C.J.

245

...A.C.J. 182

Bápuji Auditrám et al. v. Umedbhái Hathesing et al. .........A.C.J.
Bápu Rám Parbhu v. Visáji Chando Saktanekar
Bháichand bin Khemchand et al. v. Fulchand Harichand et al. A.C.J. 150
Bhisto Shankar Pátil v. Rámchandraráv Raghunáth Jahá-

girdár

Bindáchari v. I. Dracup..

Chabildás Lallubhái v Municipal Commissioner of Bombay...o.c.J.

Chaku v. Ishvar Bhudar....

Collector of Ratnagiri v. Vyankaṭráv Nárayan Surve .........A.C.J.

Collector of Súrat v. Dáji Jogi et al.

Dámodhar Mádhavji v. Kahándás Nárandás
Dámodhar Tuljárám v. Lallu Khusáldás
Dayábhái Dipchand v. Dullabhrám Dayárám
Dayábhái Dipchand v. Máṇiklál Vrijbhukan
Desáji Lakhmáji v. Bhavánidás Narotamdás
Duliá Kásam v. Abrámji Sále ........................
Dullabh Shivlál v. T. C. Hope et al.
Fakirá v. Basápá Máhádan Shetti
Fátmá Bibí v. The Collector of Súrat.....

.....