JOSEPH J. ZUSKA, M.D. Executive Committee MARVIN A. BLOCK, M.D. LUTHER A. CLOUD, M.D. RUTH FOX, M.D., (Life Member) STANLEY E. GITLOW, M.D. DONALD W. GOODWIN, M.D. PETER O. HANSEN, M.D. (AAFP Liaison Member) DAVID H. KNOTT, M.D., Ph.D. CHARLES S. LIEBER, M.D. ERNEST P. NOBLE, M.D., Ph.D. MAXWELL N. WEISMAN. M.D. Donald W. Riegle, Jr. Chairman, Subcommittee on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Senator Riegle: As current President of the American Medical Society on Alcoholism, I received your letter of June 18th, 1979 to Ms. Claire Osman, our staff assistant, for reply. Although AMSA, the medical arm of the National Council on Alcoholism, has had an active interest and leadership role in encouraging the study and communication of knowledge of the effects of alcohol on the human mind and body, the family, society and the unborn fetus, the organization has not adopted an official position on the use of warning labels as a vehicle for public education on these areas. I have, today, sent a letter to all AMSA members asking their opinions Since I realize that your Subcommittee would like immediate replies 1. I believe warning labels do have an effect in imparting health in- Allow me to quote from a very ancient document, the Announcement About 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. According to one historian, The Chinese passed and repealed prohibition laws no less than 41 times between 256 BC and 1312 AD. They were apparently no more successful than the United States. Since the purpose of the labels is to encourage a better-informed approach to alcohol use, the information should be specific. At a minimum, information should be provided on the interference of alcohol with safe operation of a motor vehicle or other machinery, the dangers to the unborn fetus, and the fact that alcohol is a drug which is potentially habit-forming in from 1/10 to 1/12 of users. Other adverse health consequences of excess use might also be covered. The greatest problem in this area in my opinion, has to do with the "how much is too much?" question. Such a message as "If you drink don't drive; if you drive don't drink" skirts the fact that small amounts of alcohol may be consumed without major driving impairment and within the law. Thus such a message, then, does not apply easily to ordinary experience. I would, therefore, suggest that to make labelling as effective as possible its imposition should be preceeded by and accompanied by public information campaigns to explain the reasons for the labels and provide the background information needed to apply such knowledge. Specifically, I would recommend that simple charts relating blood alcohol to number of drinks and body weight for men and women, and indicating legal driving limits, be posted by law in every place in which alcoholic beverages are sold. I would further recommend that a nationwide public education campaign on fetal alcohol syndrome, drinking and driving, and on problem drinking and alcoholism be initiated to explain the labels. Because of the diverse nature of the information to be conveyed, the rotating system would be desirable to keep each individual message reasonably short. Labelling distilled spirits only would give the erroneous impression that beer and wine were somehow "safe." Since beer and wine are the preferred beverages of the youthful drinker in most cases, this would be poor public policy. All of us in the treatment field have seen many cases of severe alcoholism in people who do not drink distilled liquor, "only" beer or wine. Both beer and wine should indicate alcohol content for the information of the consumer. I would also suggest substituting percentage of alcohol on liquor labels for the older "proof" measure which many people do not understand. Advertisements for beer, wine and liquor are so widespread it is difficult for any American to spend a single day without being cajoled to drink this or that alcoholic beverage. The few public service spots and magazine or newspaper articles on the subject of alcohol and health are nowhere near "equal time." Although a warning message on an advertisement will not cancel its positive impact, the warning message will get very wide exposure. For that reason I would personally favor the use of labels on advertisements. Such labels would have one more very positive effect. Millions of visitors come to this country each year from all parts of the world. The prominent display of warning labels and background information will convey a clear message to the rest of the world that we are seriously concerned about our alcohol problems. This is a message I have seldom perceived in my travels to other countries. I hope the above has been of some assistance. I will be happy to convey an official AMSA position when one is adopted. Please feel free to call on me for any further help I may provide. Yours very truly, Sheila Blume Sheila B. Blume, M.D. 1. AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY ON ALCOHOLISM New York, New York 10017 QUESTIONNAIRE Warning Labels on Alcoholic Beverages Would warning labels be effective in raising public awareness of the no 4. 5. 6. Content of label: (check all that apply) Do you favor a rotating system of labelling? For example, require that yes no_ Should beer and wine containers be required to indicate the percentage of no Should warning labels also be required on advertisements of alcoholic уль We are pleased to respond to your letter of June 4, 1979, requesting our views regarding the labeling of alcoholic beverages. This matter has been presented to our Executive Committee and we are pleased to inform you that the National Association of Alcohol ism Counselors (NAAC) has adopted the following positions: 1. NAAC favors the labeling of alcoholic beverages to indicate 2. 3. that alcohol may be hazardous to the consumer's health. NAAC favors the labeling of alcoholic beverages to provide a warning to pregnant women indicating that the consumption NAAC recommends that all alcoholic beverages and other products We would also like to express our appreciation for your letter of |