United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volume 301United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1938 - Courts |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 4
... discharged because of their union activities and for the purpose of discouraging union membership . The orders further required that the company make good the pay the men had lost through their discharge , and that it desist from ...
... discharged because of their union activities and for the purpose of discouraging union membership . The orders further required that the company make good the pay the men had lost through their discharge , and that it desist from ...
Page 5
... discharged because of their union activity or for the purpose of discouraging membership in the union , is valid . P. 47 ... discharge , less amounts earned by the employee during that period , does not contravene the provisions of the ...
... discharged because of their union activity or for the purpose of discouraging membership in the union , is valid . P. 47 ... discharge , less amounts earned by the employee during that period , does not contravene the provisions of the ...
Page 12
... discharged or demoted by the respondent because of union affilia- tions . The respondent objected to the jurisdiction of the petitioner , but its motion to dismiss was overruled and the petitioner , after hearing , determined that the ...
... discharged or demoted by the respondent because of union affilia- tions . The respondent objected to the jurisdiction of the petitioner , but its motion to dismiss was overruled and the petitioner , after hearing , determined that the ...
Page 14
... the task of piling premise upon premise and hypothesis upon hypothesis to reach the conclusion that the discharge of a few production em- 1 Argument for Respondent . ployees at the respondent's plant 14 OCTOBER TERM , 1936 .
... the task of piling premise upon premise and hypothesis upon hypothesis to reach the conclusion that the discharge of a few production em- 1 Argument for Respondent . ployees at the respondent's plant 14 OCTOBER TERM , 1936 .
Page 18
... discharge of ten employees might have led to dissatisfaction , which might have led to a labor dis- 1 Argument for Respondent . pute , which might have 18 OCTOBER TERM , 1936 . United States, 88 Commissioner, U S 344 387.
... discharge of ten employees might have led to dissatisfaction , which might have led to a labor dis- 1 Argument for Respondent . pute , which might have 18 OCTOBER TERM , 1936 . United States, 88 Commissioner, U S 344 387.
Contents
xxxvii | |
xxxviii | |
1 | |
135 | |
144 | |
155 | |
171 | |
177 | |
328 | |
334 | |
361 | |
364 | |
379 | |
393 | |
408 | |
414 | |
186 | |
203 | |
205 | |
206 | |
211 | |
214 | |
227 | |
238 | |
239 | |
256 | |
262 | |
268 | |
279 | |
289 | |
312 | |
322 | |
450 | |
454 | |
461 | |
464 | |
471 | |
514 | |
523 | |
532 | |
544 | |
548 | |
579 | |
633 | |
665 | |
688 | |
713 | |
753 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
activities affirmed Alabama amount applied Argument for Petitioner Argument for Respondent Associated Press authority burden CERTIORARI Circuit Court claim clause collective bargaining Comm'n commerce clause Commissioner Company constitutional Coronado Coal Co Corp corporation Court of Appeals decision discharge Dissenting Opinion District Court effect eggs employees employment enforcement engaged evidence ex rel exercise facts filed Fourteenth Amendment fund Georgia Helvering income incubator industrial strife interstate commerce judgment jurisdiction JUSTICE labor organization Labor Relations Act Labor Relations Board legislation Louisiana manufacture ment merce Messrs Minnesota National Bank National Labor Relations Ohio operations party patent plaintiff plant power of Congress production provides purpose question Railway Labor Act Red Lake refund regulation respect respondent's Rule Stat statute Steward Machine Co strike supra Supreme Court Texas tion Title Title IX trial Trust unfair labor practices union United validity Virginian Railway workers
Popular passages
Page 84 - labor organization" means any organization of any kind, or any agency or employee representation committee or plan, in which employees participate and which exists for the purpose, in whole or in part, of dealing with employers concerning grievances, labor disputes, wages, rates of pay, hours of employment, or conditions of work. SEC. 3.
Page 268 - The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree.
Page 588 - par, or (2) by purchase of outstanding obligations at the market price. The purposes for which obligations of the United States may be issued under the Second Liberty Bond Act, as amended, are hereby extended to authorize the issuance at par of special obligations exclusively to the Fund. Such special obligations shall bear interest at a
Page 74 - v. Carter Coal Co., supra, p. 311. Third, subsection 5 of § 8 makes it an unfair labor practice for an employer "to refuse to bargain collectively with the representatives of his employees, subject to the provisions of § 9 (a).
Page 394 - (n) Charitable and other contributions.—In the case of an individual, contributions or gifts made within the taxable year to or for the use of: (1) the United States, any State, Territory, or any political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, for exclusively public purposes; (2) any corporation, or trust, or community chest, fund, or foundation, organized and
Page 484 - (2) No court, nor any judge or judges thereof, shall have jurisdiction to issue any restraining order or temporary or permanent injunction which, in specific or general terms, prohibits any person or persons from doing, whether singly or in concert, any of the foregoing acts.
Page 474 - That is to say, mere difference is not enough: the attempted classification 'must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable and just relation to the act in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis.' Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. v. Ellis, 165 US 150, 155.
Page 518 - The Railway Labor Act; as amended or as hereafter amended. Service performed by those engaged as solicitors or agents for Insurance Companies; (7) Service performed in the employ of a state, or political subdivision thereof, or an instrumentality of one or more states or political subdivisions; (8) Service performed in the employ of a corporation, community chest, fund, or foundation, organized and
Page 506 - Provided, That all offenses the penalty for which does not exceed confinement in a common jail, without hard labor for a period of six months, or a fine of not more than $500, or both, shall be deemed to be petty offenses; and all such petty offenses may be prosecuted upon information or complaint.
Page 751 - in commerce, or burdening or obstructing commerce, or the free flow of commerce, or having led or tending to lead to a labor dispute burdening or obstructing commerce or the free flow of commerce.