Page images
PDF
EPUB

SERMON XXIX.

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN

PROVED

FROM REVELATION AND FROM FACTS.

ROMANS V. 12.

Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death hath passed upon all men, for that all have sinned.

In the three preceding discourses, I have considered the Trial, Temptation, Apostasy, and Sentence, of our first Parents. The next subject in a Theological system, is the Effect of the Apostasy on their descendants. The consideration of this subject I shall, therefore, begin in the following discourse.

In the Text, independently of all comments and criticisms. three things are directly asserted.

I. That by one Man Sin entered the world:

II. That in consequence of this event all men have sinned :

III. That Death, as the consequence of sin, hath passed upon all men.

Concerning the last of these assertions there is no debate. The two first, therefore, will occupy the present discussion; and these, for the sake of convenience, I shall reduce to the single, following proposition :

[blocks in formation]

That in consequence of the Apostasy of Adam, All Men have

sinned.

Before I enter on the examination of this doctrine, I shall premise a few observations, which, I hope, will, in some degree, be useful towards accomplishing the general design, proposed in this sermon.

Perhaps no doctrine is more reluctantly received by the human mind, than that, which I have just now stated. Accordingly, it has been strenuously contended against, and resolutely rejected, not only by Infidels, but by a considerable part of the Christian world, ever since it became a topic of public debate. Nor, when we remember the present character of man, can we think it strange, that such opposition should exist. The doctrine in question, more than any other, humbles the pride, awakens the fears, and lessens the happiness, of every child of Adam. A common interest, therefore, naturally summons all men to oppose it; and not unfrequently bears down the evidence, by which it is supported. Christians feel this interest as truly as other men; and under the influence of this feeling resist, or forget, the proof of the doctrine. At the same time, the doctrine itself, it must be acknowledged, is connected with many things very mysterious, and very perplexing. These, adding embarrassment to reluctance, have, in many instances, persuaded men to refuse the doctrine, in spite of the testimony of Experience and Revelation. For myself, I readily confess, that, if I saw any mode of avoiding the evidence, by which it is established, I would certainly reject it also.

But it can never be wise, it can never be vindicable, to deny truth, or reject evidence. If the doctrine be true; it is our interest to know it: if it be clearly evinced; it is our duty to receive it; and that, however reluctant we may be, and however mysterious the doctrine. To every sober man this duty will appear of high importance, and indispensable obligation, if he finds, that God has taught him this doctrine, as one of the truths, which he has been pleased to require mankind to believe. To the interest, always involved in the performance of our duty, he will find also, superadded, the solemn concern of coming to the knowledge of his own guilt and danger, that he may be induced to

avail himself of the only means of pardon and safety. While he feels himslf whole, he certainly can never suspect his need of a physician: while he is unaware of his guilt, he cannot be supposed ever to look to Christ for deliverance.

With these things in view, I hope, that every member of this audience will readily open his mind to the discussion of this subject, melancholy and painful as it is; whilst, in proof of the doctrine, I allege the following arguments, derived partly from fact, and partly from Revelation.

From Revelation I allege,

1st. The Text, as decisive proof of this doctrine.

This proof is two-fold. First, the doctrine is directly asserted, All have sinned. Lest there should be any doubt, whether an absolute universality is intended in this place, the Apostle has exhibited his intention in the most decisive manner. So death hath passed upon all men, for that all have sinned. Here we are taught, that all sin, who die. As, therefore, every child of Adam dies; so, according to the sentence of the Apostle, every child of Adam is a sinner. Secondly, the Apostle proves the doctrine by argument, and in my view unanswerably. Death cannot be the reward, or allotment, of virtuous beings. It is plainly a punishment, and a dreadful one; and can of course be, in no possible sense, a testimony of the divine approbation. But the approbation of God is invariably given to obedience. If, then, all men were obedient only; not one of them could suffer death, or any other evil. Accordingly, Adam, while obedient, was assured of immortal life. In the same manner, also, the Angels, who kept their first estate, are immortal, and happy.

But death befals all the race of Adam: therefore every one is a sinner.

2dly. After Adam had lost the image of God, we are informed, that he begat a son in his own likeness.

The image of God, in which Adam was created, has been heretofore shown to be divine knowledge, righteousness, and true holiness. The likeness of Adam is, by unquestionable analogy, the moral character which he possessed after his apostasy. In this likeness Seth is said to have been begotten. That Cain was begotten in the same likeness will not be disputed. The same

thing is indirectly, but decisively, asserted also concerning Abel: for he is declared to have lived, and died, in faith, that is, in the future Redeemer. But Christ, as the Redeemer, could not have been an object of faith to Abel, had he not been a sinner; or, in other words, had he not borne the likeness of apostate Adam. But, if this was the nature of the immediate children of Adam, it cannot even be suspected, that it is not equally the nature of his remoter progeny; or that they do not all bear the likeness of their common parent. Not a shadow of reason can be given, why one law should have governed the birth and character of his immediate descendants, and another, the birth and character of the rest.

3dly. St. Paul, in the three first chapters of the epistle to the Romans, has argued this point, at large, concerning both Jews and Gentiles.

On this argument he himself is, undoubtedly, the best commentator; and his comment is given to us in the following terms. What then? are we (Jews) better than they (Gentiles?) No, in no wise; for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin; As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one. There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one.

4thly. The same Apostle declares, that by the works of law, no flesh shall be justified in the sight of God.

But if sinless men, if even one sinless man, existed in this world, he could not fail to be justified by the works of law: for the law itself says, He who doth these things, that is, the things required in the law, shall live by them. As, therefore, no flesh, no child of Adam, shall be justified by the works of law; it follows irresistibly, that every one is sinful.

J. Of the same purport is the declaration of Christ to Nicodemus, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God. The only use, or effect, of the new birth is, that in it holiness is implanted in the mind. But if any man were sinless, he could not need regeneration, nor be regenerated. He would already perfectly possess that holiness, which is imperfectly communicated in regeneration; and, of course, would see the kingdom of

God as certainly, and easily, at least, as those who possessed less holiness than himself.

In the like manner, St. Paul argues, 2 Cor. v. xiv. For, says he, we thus judge; that if one died for all, then were all dead, that is, in trespasses and sins.

To these Scriptural exhibitions on this subject I might add a vast multitude of others. In truth, no doctrine of the Scriptures is expressed in more numerous, or more various, forms; or in terms more direct, or less capable of misapprehension.

What the Scriptures declare in so pointed and ample a manner. Facts elucidate with such clearness and force, as to be, at least in my opinion, incapable of being rationally resisted.

1st. The Laws of all nations are a strong proof, that the human character is universally sinful.

Human laws are made, only to repress and restrain sin; are derived only from experience; and are forced upon mankind by iron-handed necessity. They exist in every country; and restrain sin of every kind, which human laws can affect, or human tribunals can prove, and punish. The penalties, by which they attempt this restraint, are various and dreadful; are the most effieacious, which experience can suggest, or ingenuity devise; and are changed continually, as they are found to fail of their effect, by the substitution of others, which promise greater success. Still they have always fallen short of their purpose. The propensity to evil in the heart of man, has defied all their force and terror; and boldly ventured on the forbidden perpetration, in the sight of the pillory and the prison, the gibbet and the rack. No ingenuity on the one hand, and no suffering on the other, has, in any country, been sufficient to overcome this propensity, and so far to change the character of man, as to exterminate even a single sin.

To this head ought to be referred all the means, furnished by law, of safety to our persons and our property: the bolts, bars, and locks, by which we endeavour to defend our houses and their contents, our persons and our families, especially in the night, against the inroads of theft and violence: the notes, bonds, and deeds, by which we endeavour to secure our contracts, prevent the mischiefs of fraud, and compel dishonesty to fulfil its engage

« PreviousContinue »