Page images
PDF
EPUB

Exports to the Colonies-Increases due to Wars.

(Answered by Mr. Secretary Brodrick.) expeditionary force was formally broken The inquiry was a departmental inquiry up in March, and the small body of troops and it has not been decided to publish which has since been in the field has been the Report. The recommendations have engaged in the pursuit of the ex-Sultan of been very carefully considered, and Sokoto. I have no information as to the action is being taken upon it. number of medical officers or veterinary surgeons attached to this small force. In answer to the second part of the Question, the casualties in action during April, May, and June, were three British officers slightly wounded; one British non-commissioned officer severely wounded; four native rank and file killed, four severely wounded, and seventy-seven slightly wounded. These include an engagement, the date of which is not precisely known, and may have been early in July.

MR. WHITLEY THOMSON (Yorkshire, W.R., Skipton): To ask the Secretary of State for the Colonies if he will state, for the years 1900, 1901, and 1902, what are the amounts of increases in the exports to the colonies, due to wars in South Africa, Nigeria, and elsewhere, specifying the amounts of the increase to each colony.

(Answered by Mr. Secretary Chamberlain.) I cannot undertake to say to what extent the increases in the exports to the colonies are due to the wars in South Africa, Nigeria, and elsewhere; but it may interest the hon. Member to know that the value of the exports of the produce and manufactures of the United Kingdom to the South and West African Colonies respectively for the last five years have been as under-South Africa, 1898, £12,199,810; 1899, £11,370,125; 1900, £12,757,875; 1901, £17,154,380; 1902, £24,436,739. West Africa, 1898, £1,999,445; 1899, £2,116,080; 1900, £2,148,149; 1901, £2,347,319; 1902, £2,737,486.

Sugar Convention-Number of White Population of West Indies who will benefit.

MR. MARKHAM (Nottinghamshire, Mansfield): To ask the Secretary of State for the Colonies, will he state the approximate number of white British subjects in the West Indies whom His Majesty's Government anticipate will benefit under the Sugar Convention; and whether he has any particulars of the mortgages on the estates of the sugar planters and the number of absentee landlords.

(Answered by Mr. Secretary Chamberlain.) I have not the information necessary to answer the hon. Member's Question. In some of the West Indian Colonies no

Medical and Veterinary Officers with the regular census was taken in 1901, owing

Northern Nigeria Force.

MR. WINSTON CHURCHILL (Oldham): To ask the Secretary of State for

the Colonies whether he will state how

many medical officers and veterinary surgeons were serving with the Northern Nigeria Force during the month of June last; and what were the total casualties

of that force in action in the months of April, May, and June.

(Answered by Mr. Secretary Chamberlain.) The establishment of the medical department in Northern Nigeria whose duties include attendance on both the military and the civil officials, contains twenty-seven medical officers, of whom, owing to the absence of the remainder on leave, about eighteen are usually in the protectorate. The Kano-Sokoto

to inability to bear the cost, and reference to cases in which a census was taken

shows that as a rule no enumeration is made by colour. I may add that the the coloured British subjects in the West Sugar Convention is intended to benefit the coloured British subjects in the West Indies, who form the overwhelming majority of the population, quite as much as the white. I have no particulars of mortgages on sugar estates or of absentee landlords.

QUESTIONS IN THE HOUSE.

Recovery of Boer Bibles. MR. BRYN ROBERTS (Carnarvonshire, Eifion): I beg to ask the Secretary of State for War whether he can state how many Bibles that were looted from Boer farms by British or Colonial troops

during the late war have been received | cases to Protestant clergymen ; are there

and restored to their owners in response to Lord Roberts's Memorandum on the • subject.

*THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WAR (Mr. BRODRICK, Surrey, Guildford): Lord Roberts has taken this matter up privately-not officially. I am not aware of the results.

MR. BRYN ROBERTS: I beg to ask Mr. Attorney-General whether, in order to induce the restoration of Bibles looted from Boer farms in response to Lord Roberts's Memorandum on the subject, he can promise that persons voluntarily giving up the same will not be prosecuted for receiving stolen goods, knowing the same to have been stolen.

THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL (Sir ROBERT FINLAY, Inverness Burghs): I think the hon. Gentleman may dismiss from his mind any apprehension that any promise of the kind will be necessary.

Somaliland-Ammunition.

MR. DILLON (Mayo, E.): I beg to ask the Secretary of State for War what is the nature of the ammunition with greater stopping power which has been sent to Somaliland; and whether he will give directions that any hon. Member who applies shall be supplied with specimens of the ammunition.

* MR. BRODRICK: The ammunition sent to Somaliland is Mark V. I am afraid that I cannot agree to supply specimens as suggested, but I will have a sample bullet sent to the tea-room.

SIR WILFRID LAWSON (Cornwall, Camborne): Does "stopping power" mean "killing power"?

[No answer was returned.]

"Blessing the Colours"-Roman Catholic Ecclesiastics.

MR. T. M. HEALY (Louth, N.): I beg to ask the Secretary of State for War under what conditions or regulations are Roman Catholic ecclesiastics invited to bless military flags; is this invitation extended in the case of the presentation of all new colours to Roman Catholic ecclesiastics; if not, is it extended in all

any cases in which Protestant clergymen are invited, in which Roman Catholic clergymen are not invited; in how many cases in the last ten years have Protestant clergymen been asked to bless colours when Roman Catholics were not invited, and in how many were Roman Catholics invited to participate with Protestant clergymen ; were Roman Catholic clergymen ever asked to officiate without the attendance of Protestant clergymen ; under what circumstances was the Bishop of Cork asked to bless colours along with a Protestant clergyman on the occasion of His Majesty's visit to Cork, when an Irish regiment, mainly Roman Catholic, was presented with regimental colours by the King; and would the War Office, before issuing such invitations, endeavour to ascertain the conditions upon which alone Roman Catholic ecclesiastics can officiate on such ceremonies.

for the consecration of regimental colours *MR. BRODRICK: The arrangements are in the hands of the general officer commanding and the officer commanding the regiment. Where the regiment is an Irish one, the representative of the Roman Catholic Church is usually invited by the commanding officer to take the consecration, the Anglican chaplain taking a share in the ceremony by agreement, as representative of the Protestants in the regiment. The statistics for which the hon. Member asks could not be obtained without considerable trouble. As regards the particular case mentioned, the Bishop of Cork offered personally to perform the ceremony, but at the last moment, realising that the ceremony was to be mixed, declined to take part and refused to allow any of his priests to officiate. In the case of the Irish Guards the Roman Catholic priest performed the dedication and then withdrew; and subsequently the Chaplain-General performed his part of the ceremony.

MR. T. M. HEALY: What is a "mixed consecration"?

* MR. BRODRICK: A mixed consecration is one at which the representatives of both Churches attend, and the representative of the Roman Catholic Church takes one part of the ceremony and the representative of the Protestant Church the other.

Imperial Irish Yeomanry. MR. JOYCE (Limerick): I beg to ask the Secretary of State for War if he will state by whom and under what warrant or authority a body of Yeomanry, called Imperial Irish Yeomanry, have been raised in County Limerick, where this body is training, and who is in command; and whether the person enlisting for this corps receives a capitation grant; and, if so, how much.

*MR. BRODRICK: This body is being raised under the Militia Act, 1882, and the Militia and Yeomanry Act, 1902, by its commanding officer, LieutenantColonel Lord Waterford. The regiment is being trained at the Curragh. The usual capitation grant of £3 will be granted to the regiment for efficients.

Government Contractors-Underwood

and Son.

SIR CARNE RASCH (Essex, Chelmsford): I beg to ask the Secretary of State for War whether he is aware that Messrs. Underwood and Son, hay dealers, were struck off the list of contractors to the War Office; that they subsequently tendered through the firm of Bennett and Son, and that they have since contracted through the firm of Prentis, of Great Tower Street, for compressed fodder, the last lot of 200 tons of 'which was condemned; and, if so, will he say what the War Office propose to do in the matter.

MR. BRODRICK: When the contract was made there was no reason whatever for supposing that Mr. Prentis had any connection with Messrs. Underwood. The fodder referred to has been sold and the difference between its cost to the public and the amount realised by its sale will be recovered from the contractor. Mr. Prentis will be removed from the list.

Savings Banks Bill.

SIR ALBERT ROLLIT (Islington, S.): I beg to ask Mr. Chancellor of the Exchequer whether it is intended to proceed with the Savings Banks Bill re ferred to in His Majesty's Speech at the opening of Parliament.

THE CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER (Mr. RITCHIE, Croydon): No, Sir, it has not been found possible to proceed with this B.ll.

Holloway Prison.

MR. LOUGH (Islington, W.): I beg to ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether, seeing that the original intention was that the prison at Holloway should merely be used as a house of detention, and having regard to his promises in the matter and to the character of the neighbourhood, he has been able to arrange that no further death sentences shall be

carried out there.

THE

*THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HOME DEPARTMENT (Mr. AKERS DOUGLAS, Kent, St. Augustine's): I have, as, promised, considered this matter very carefully in all its aspects. The only other promise I have made on the subject was to the effect that, unless means were found by which the death sentence could be carried out at Holloway Prison in such a manner that no part of the proceedings could be seen from anywhere outside, executions would not be continued at that prison. As I stated the other day, I believe such means can be found; and I am not prepared to alter the arrangement by which in London the death sentences on women (which are, I am happy to say, few) will be carried out at Holloway Prison.

Workmen's Trains on the South Eastern and Chatham Railway.

MR. CROOKS (Woolwich): I beg to ask the President of the Board of Trade whether his attention has been called to the fact that the South Eastern and Chatham Railway Companies are not carrying out the obligations imposed upon them by the Act of 1899 to run an efficient service of trains; that there are several stations within the twenty miles radius at which no workmen's tickets are issued, and that persons holding workmen's tickets are not allowed to return from Ludgate Hill station; and, if so, will he state what steps he proposes to take against these companies compliance with the Act of Parliament.

for non

THE PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD OF TRADE (Mr. GERALD BALFOUR, Leeds, Central): Representations in this matter have been made to the Board of Trade, who have communicated thereon with the Managing Committee of the Railway

Companies.

viz., in the year 1873 actual values as follows, £626,000,000, and in the year 1883 actual values £667,000,000, values computed at prices of 1873, £861,000,000, he could give figures on the same basis for the years 1893 and 1902.

The Committee take the enumerated articles) were view that there is no reasonable necessity for the issue of workmen's tickets at those stations (within a radius of twenty miles) at which they are not already issued. Whether the Committee are right in contending that a sufficient service, as prescribed by the special Act of 1899, is already supplied, would be for inquiry in the manner provided by Section 32 of that Act. If representations of the nature there prescribed are made to the Board, I will cause a hearing to be held. As regards Ludgate Hill station, the Companies state that great complaint was formerly made of the overcrowding on the small platforms at this station, involving danger to the crowds collected there, and they suggest that it is in the interests of all concerned that the present arrangement whereby holders of workmen's return tickets are required to travel from neighbouring stations, instead of from Ludgate Hill, should remain undisturbed. This contention appears prima facie reasonable.

MR. GERALD BALFOUR: I cannot

Belgian Sugar Legislation. MR. LOUGH : I beg to ask the President of the Board of Trade whether his attention has been drawn to the Bill which has been introduced into the Belgian Parliament with reference to sugar and sugar products under the Convention, and, if so, will he state whether the rates on the import of confectionery from this country have been fixed in accordance with Article III.; and, if not, does the Government propose to take any steps in the matter.

MR. GERALD BALFOUR: I have seen the Bill referred to by the hon. Member. The point as to whether the measure is in accord with the Convention is one for the consideration of the Permanent Commission.

Trade Statistics.

SIR CHARLES RENSHAW (Renfrewshire, W.): I beg to ask the President of the Board of Trade whether, in view of the fact that the Royal Commission on Trade Depression reported in 1886 that the declared value of imports and exports in 1873 and 1883 compared with the computed values (on the assumption that the values of the whole trade are affected by differences in prices as are the values of

give the figures in the precise form asked for without exhaustive investigation. The Board of Trade have, however, calculated an Index number showing the year since 1871, and the following figures average level of general prices in each based on that estimate may be of interest to my hon. friend. Declared value of imports and exports in 1893 £682,000,000; ditto in 1902 £878,000,000. Approximate computed value of imports and exports at 1873 values on the assumption that the average value of the articles of our foreign trade has followed the general movement of prices of commodities as shown by the Board of Trade Index number, in 1893, £1,029,000,000; in 1902, £1,323,000,000. If the above method were applied to the figures of 1883 the result would be £821,000,000. It is to be remembered that the level of prices in 1873 was higher than in any year since 1826.

MR. HERBERT SAMUEL (Yorkshire, Cleveland): Can the right hon. Gentleman give the separately on the same basis? imports and exports

MR. GERALD BALFOUR: Yes; that can be done.

West Hampstead Telephone Service. DR. AMBROSE (Mayo, W.): I beg to ask the he is aware Postmaster-General whether Cricklewood and Brondesbury districts that inhabitants in the of West Hampstead are anxious to use the Post Office telephone service; that the general manager of the telephone department has been written to with a view to have the telephone laid on to the houses while the road is up, and that no satisfactory cause of the delay has been given; and, if so, whether, considering that the ratepayers will be put to unnecessary expense if the road is repaired before the telephones are supplied to the houses, he will see that they are supplied without any undue delay.

THE POSTMASTER-GENERAL (Mr. AUSTEN CHAMBERLAIN, Worcestershire, E.): The Hampstead Exchange, which will serve the district referred to by the hon. Member, will, it is hoped, be opened at the end of the year. The underground wires for the service of a considerable part of the area to be served have already been provided, and no difficulty is anticipated in providing the lines of the hon. Member and other subscribers now awaiting connection, by the time the Exchange is ready. I am making inquiry as to the particular work in the roadway referred to in the Question. No expense is, however, caused to ratepayers in connection with the laying of Post Office wires under roadways. If the Postmaster-General breaks up a road, he has to restore the surface, or at least pay for its restoration.

[blocks in formation]

THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL

FOR

Dalkey Polling District. MR. MOONEY (Dublin Co., S.): I beg to ask the Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland whether his attention has been drawn to resolutions of the Dalkey and Killiney Councils in favour of the establishment of a revision Court at Dalkey; and, if so, whether, seeing that the present system of holding at Kingstown the revision Court for the Dalkey Polling District causes inconvenience and loss to the labouring classes owing to the distance of the Court from the Killiney and Dalkey districts, he will now grant the revision Court asked for.

MR. ATKINSON (for Mr. WYNDHAM): This question has been carefully investigated by the Lord Lieutenant, who finds no sufficient reason for making the suggested change.

Irish Caretakers and the Land Bill. MR. DELANY: I beg to ask the Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland whether, in view of the fact, as shown by the quarterly Return ending 30th June last, that 580 tenants in under Section 7 of the Land Law (IreIreland were converted into caretakers land) Act, 1887, he will consider the advisability of repealing this section, or in the meantime taking some other steps to suspend its operation pending the passing into law of the Land Bill at present before Parliament.

MR. ATKINSON (for Mr. WYNDHAM):

IRELAND (Mr. ATKINSON, Londonderry; The operation of this enactment could N., for Mr. WYNDHAM): The facts, I I am understand, are correctly stated. making further inquiry in the matter and would ask the hon. Member to repeat the Question on Wednesday next.

Evicted Tenants and the Land Bill. MR. DELANY: I beg to ask the Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland whether the fact of an evicted tenant being in possession of a holding debars him under the Land Bill from purchasing a larger and more valuable holding from which he had been evicted within the last twenty-five years, or another farm of equivalent value.

MR. ATKINSON (for Mr. WYNDHAM): The answer to this Question is in the negative.

not be suspended without legislation. It of such legislation at the present period is not practicable to consider the question of the session, and my right hon. friend cannot give an undertaking with respect to a future session.

Bundorrhagha Pier.

DR. AMBROSE: I beg to ask the Chief Secretary to the Lord - Lieutenant of Ireland whether his attention has been drawn to the fact that during the recent visit of Their Majesties to the village of Bundorrhagha on Killery Bay, the Royal yacht could not come alongside the pier owing to the shallowness of the water; and whether, considering the inconvenience caused on such occasion, and the fact that the present pier does not extend into deep water,

« PreviousContinue »